On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:37:11PM -0700, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> Ok, I'll jump on that grenade. Have the engineers heard of Linux or BSD? ;)
Thank you for taking one for the team. It is indeed hard to say that
one's seriously competing in the Indy 500 when one shows up at the
starting line w
Hi all -- we continue to see Action: failed/Status: 5.4.0 bounces for
emails sent to Hotmail, Outlook, and Microsoft domains. I assume others are
seeing the same?
Microsoft friends, any idea on a resolution time? This feels like it's
taking a while to be resolved.
--
[image: Dyn logo, Dyn.com]
Hi Josh,
I don’t see it at all. I used to.
Met vriendelijke groet,
David Hofstee
Deliverability Management
MailPlus B.V. Netherlands
Van: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] Namens Josh Nason
Verzonden: woensdag 30 maart 2016 15:01
Aan: mailop@mailop.org
Onderwerp: [mailop] Still seeing
> My question as well. There are several well-done server packages. And also
> Exchange.
To elaborate, we are looking for someone to whom we can refer those clients who
are asking for assistance to set up authentication on their Windows servers.
We're trying to *give someone some consulting
To elaborate, it's like saying you're looking for somebody who works
on cars. It's not descriptive enough. Foreign? Domestic? Specializes
in VW?
--
Al Iverson
www.aliverson.com
(312)725-0130
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Anne Mitchell wrote:
>
>> My question as well. There are several well
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:58:23 -0500, Al Iverson
wrote:
>To elaborate, it's like saying you're looking for somebody who works
>on cars. It's not descriptive enough. Foreign? Domestic? Specializes
>in VW?
Aye.
For instance, in the server I use (MDaemon) it is a matter of going to the
right config
Which is exactly what framed the tenor of my question when I originally asked
it. Very Large Providers operate at a scale and under commercial pressures that
most of us (including me) cannot even imagine.
--
Anthony Rodgers
Security Analyst
Michigan Security Operations Center (MiSOC)
DTMB, Michi
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:37:09PM +, Rodgers, Anthony (DTMB) wrote:
> Which is exactly what framed the tenor of my question when I originally
> asked it. Very Large Providers operate at a scale and under commercial
> pressures that most of us (including me) cannot even imagine.
Yes, but...
I
For my org, I have all my filtering on a single server (well, a pair in
parallel, but you get my meaning). But that's not going to work for Hotmail.
Hotmail undoubtedly has multiple levels of filtering. Each check they do with
the SMTP connection open increases the connection time and decreases
Hi Anne,
I was also waiting for details, but since your request has a wider scope I can
no longer resist to stand up.
We help senders to implement best practices, including DKIM. We are biased
towards Linux and PowerMTA, but Windows should be fine too.
Please contact me off list if you want to d
The shape of the systems are quite different. For instance, DNSBLs. If we
queried SpamHaus, or any other DNSBL provider directly, they would instantly
fall over. How long it takes to process each email becomes hyper critical...
But you know, these Disk Size Wars are pointless. We're hiring! And
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 14:41:44 -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>Yes, but...
>
>If you can run a mail system *properly* for 50,000 people, then you can
>run it properly for 500 million. It's not really all that different
>or difficult.
You apparently have yet to run up against the version of the squ
Looks like the cert for chilli.nosignal.org expired about a month ago.
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fchilli.nosignal.org%2fcgi-bin%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2fmailop&data=01%7c01%7cmichael.wise%40microsoft.com%7cb520e5e9388e431ff62c08d358cbde70%7c72f988bf86f141af
1) We require each FD server to accept around a thousand connections a second.
:(
2) AV is not in our team's scope, but... yeah.
3) Hehehe... I <3 RegEx. I'd say more, but ... We're Being Watched. And not by
Yoda.
And then there's fingerprinting, clustering, campaign ... I'm repeating
my
Not seeing any here.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Josh Nason wrote:
> Hi all -- we continue to see Action: failed/Status: 5.4.0 bounces for
> emails sent to Hotmail, Outlook, and Microsoft domains. I assume others are
> seeing the same?
>
> Microsoft friends, any idea on a resolution time? T
We are still seeing some.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Joel Beckham wrote:
> Not seeing any here.
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Josh Nason wrote:
>
>> Hi all -- we continue to see Action: failed/Status: 5.4.0 bounces for
>> emails sent to Hotmail, Outlook, and Microsoft domains. I as
Is the, “5.4.0 “ the entire bounce code / response?
If there’s more, we need to know to build a case.
If that’s it, that should be enough, but we need to know which it is.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been
Processed." | Got the Junk Mail
I emailed the list owners back on 3/20 about this as well...no response. :\
Hope somebody didn't die.
Cheers,
Al
--
Al Iverson
www.aliverson.com
(312)725-0130
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> Looks like the cert for chilli.nosignal.org expired about a month ago.
>
>>
18 matches
Mail list logo
