Is it my imagination or did the List-Id header change? Is this
intentional/permanent and/or should I update filtering rules?
Previously:
List-Id: For mail operators
Now:
List-Id: For mail operators
--
Dave Warren
http://www.hireahit.com/
http://ca.linkedin.com/in/davejwarren
___
Your own message has this List-ID:
List-Id: For mail operators
Cheers,
Al
--
Al Iverson - Minneapolis - (312) 275-0130
Simple DNS Tools since 2008: xnnd.com
www.spamresource.com & aliverson.com
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Dave Warren wrote:
> Is it my imagination or did the List-Id hea
Dave -
I too received this message earlier today with the odd header:
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/mailop/2015-December/006732.html
Return-Path: mailop-boun...@chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:36:34 -0700
Message-ID:
From: Luke M
To: mailop@mailop
On 2015-12-01 17:12, Mitchell Kuch wrote:
Dave -
I too received this message earlier today with the odd header:
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/mailop/2015-December/006732.html
Return-Path: mailop-boun...@chilli.default.andyd.uk0.bigv.io
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:36:34 -0700
>> List-Id: For mail operators
>It had the feel of a list that moved and didn't announce it, or a server
>that runs both domains and defaulted to the wrong domain/details, but I
>didn't investigate far enough to see if there is any overlap between MX
>records or anything else.
The host names
