Hi,
Dňa Sun, 5 Dec 2021 19:51:15 + ml+mailop--- via mailop
napísal:
> "What's the problem you are trying to solve?"
Basically no problem here. I never seen message with unqualified
postmaster (RCPT). To be honest, i miss this part of RFC before.
I only try to understand, how to deal with u
*From: *Slavko via mailop
*Subject: *Re: [mailop] postmaster: envelope vs header
I think a little about it, but i cannot find other way than do not use
To: header at all, which will be penalized in my anti-spam SW latter.
How about
To: Postmaster
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> I think a little about it, but i cannot find other way than do not use
> To: header at all, which will be penalized in my anti-spam SW latter.
"What's the problem you are trying to solve?"
Is this about the differences between envelope and header(s
Hi,
Dňa Sun, 5 Dec 2021 11:24:04 + ml+mailop--- via mailop
napísal:
> Anyway, my mail was only about a clear violation of the (SMTP) RFC
> by comcast.
Yes, i understand that, and my question was not to you only (sorry, if
it was not clean).
I think a little about it, but i cannot find othe
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> But, please, what about header:
> To: postmaster
> ... rejected after DATA: header syntax: unqualified address not
> permitted: failing address in "To:" header is: postmaster
The syntax for envelope addresses and header addresses is "a
