> On 29 Aug 2023, at 03:31, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>
> It appears that Anne Mitchell via mailop said:
>> I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it was a big win
>> for Gmail plus has language which is applicable to any ISP.
>
> Mike Masnick at the always interesti
It appears that Anne Mitchell via mailop said:
>I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it was a big win
>for Gmail plus has language which is applicable to any ISP.
Mike Masnick at the always interesting Techdirt blog has a longer take. You
can tell from the URL what he th
It appears that Mark E. Jeftovic via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Maybe one of the reasons the right-side of the political spectrum are
>more aggressive spammers, is that it's a knock-on effect from being
>marginalized within mainstream channels and leftist BigTech platforms.
>
>May
uits. Everyone will
suffer greatly if 47US230 is altered or replaced in an unwise way.
Rob McEwen, invaluement
-- Original Message --
From "Anne Mitchell via mailop"
To "Gellner, Oliver via mailop"
Date 8/26/2023 2:29:46 PM
Subject [mailop] RNC v. Google Disposi
ced in an unwise way.
Rob McEwen, invaluement
-- Original Message --
From "Anne Mitchell via mailop"
To "Gellner, Oliver via mailop"
Date 8/26/2023 2:29:46 PM
Subject [mailop] RNC v. Google Dispositioin
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it wa
ll suffer greatly if
47US230 is altered or replaced in an unwise way.
Rob McEwen, invaluement
-- Original Message --
From "Anne Mitchell via mailop"
To "Gellner, Oliver via mailop"
Date 8/26/2023 2:29:46 PM
Subject [mailop] RNC v. Google Dispositioin
I'm su
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this here, because it was a big win for
Gmail plus has language which is applicable to any ISP.
In the order (in which the RNC complaint was dismissed) the court basically not
only smacked down the RNC, but made clear that the Communications Decency Act
