> Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable
> us to whitelist?
We try to keep up to date on IPs from Google Mail (and of course others) at
dnswl.org, and one important use case for this data is to skip greylisting for
any of the IPs found there (regardless of
On Feb 25, 2016 5:03 PM, "Dave Warren" wrote:
>
> On 2016-02-25 15:53, Mike Reed wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brandon,
>>
>> Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to
enable us to whitelist?
>>
>
> _spf.google.com.300 IN TXT "v=spf1 include:_
netblocks.google.com
On 2016-02-25 15:53, Mike Reed wrote:
Hi Brandon,
Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to
enable us to whitelist?
_spf.google.com.300 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com
include:_netblocks3.google.co
On 2016-02-25 15:30, Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with
Gmail, since there is no guarantee that the retries will be performed
from the same IP address... in fact, the chances are really high that
it's from a different one.
By ty
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Mike Reed wrote:
> Hi Brandon,
>
> Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable
> us to whitelist?
https://support.google.com/a/answer/60764?hl=en
SPF records are actually pretty useful for that, you can extract the
outbound SMTP IP
Hi Brandon,
Does GMail publish a list of its outbound hosts/ranges some place to enable
us to whitelist?
Kind regards,
Mike
On 25 February 2016 at 23:30, Brandon Long via mailop
wrote:
> I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with
> Gmail, since there is no guarantee t
I should point out that "typical" greylisting doesn't work well with Gmail,
since there is no guarantee that the retries will be performed from the
same IP address... in fact, the chances are really high that it's from a
different one.
By typical, I mean based on any tuple which includes IP.
We w
Hi there, not sure what the correct protocol for answering these things is, but
here goes so at least you know it has been resolved.
After looking at the logs myself from the shell of the Sophos UTM, the UTM was
in fact Greylisting.
Why Sophos did not originally spot this when I raised the ca
