Dňa 11. júna 2023 11:56:00 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via mailop
napísal:
>I have valid ham messages with type="multipart/alternative" .
>multipart/related type="multipart/alternative"
> multipart/alternative
> multipart/text plain version
> multipart/html flashy version
> image/...
>
On 2023-06-11, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> Now i did search in both, the my MX's SPAM archive and
> my own maildir. I found really small amount of multipart/related
> with type= argument in my maildir, all was pointing to text/html.
> I found relative many multipart/related nessages in SPAM
> archi
Dňa 11. júna 2023 9:57:25 UTC používateľ Julian Bradfield via mailop
napísal:
>Try reading RFC2387. Yes, your guess is right.
Thanks, that was what i miss.
Now i did search in both, the my MX's SPAM archive and
my own maildir. I found really small amount of multipart/related
with type= argumen
On 2023-06-11, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> from time to time i get SPAM with Content-Type with extra
> type= argument, eg.:
>
> Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; ...
>
> I spend a lot of time to find where that type= argument is
> defined. I guess, that they try do
Hi all,
from time to time i get SPAM with Content-Type with extra
type= argument, eg.:
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; ...
I spend a lot of time to find where that type= argument is
defined. I guess, that they try do define which nested part
is "main".
I creat
