Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

On Mon, 20 Sep 2021, Brielle via mailop wrote: On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Florian Effenberger via mailop wrote: seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html (see "Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send reports yet. Hah, that makes it easy

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

There's a number of them on github. https://github.com/topics/dmarc-reports *Zach RoseEmail Deliverability Manager* [image: SharpSpring Marketing Automation] Partner Support: 1-888-428-9605, option 1 E: zach...@sharpspring.com W: www.sharpspring.com

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

> On Sep 20, 2021, at 9:05 AM, Florian Effenberger via mailop > wrote: > > seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html (see > "Reporting" section). Didn't try it myself though, I don't send reports yet. Hah, that makes it easy doesn’t it. I love rspamd - so glad I t

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

Hi, Brielle via mailop wrote on 20.09.21 at 16:33: You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports. Is there any (preferably free / open source) tools to make generating these aggregate reports easy enough? seems rspamd supports this: https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

On 9/12/21 9:59 AM, Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote: I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 messages a day? You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports. Is there any (prefer

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

On Tue 14/Sep/2021 22:36:19 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote: Would that have a meaningful impact on the underlying problem? It could move from 10 - 20 messages per day to 200 - 400, if you also send complaints. BTW, complaining against, for example, random login attempts rather than spam doesn't

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

To: mailop@mailop.org Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 8:30:04 AM Subject: [mailop] Low Volume Senders Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what I'm looking for, so I thought I would ask. Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inabi

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

2, 2021 10:59:02 AM Subject: Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote: > > I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 > messages a day? You could increase that volume by sending DMARC ag

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

On Fri 10/Sep/2021 16:53:35 +0200 Mike Hammett wrote: I'm sending from a single IP. It's just a low-volume server. Maybe 10 - 20 messages a day? You could increase that volume by sending DMARC aggregate reports. Best Ale -- ___ mailop m

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

o: mailop@mailop.org Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 9:43:54 AM Subject: Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders When I cut my sending infrastructure back from a /22 to a /24, I noticed reputation improvements pretty well across the board. That mainly being because with a /22, no single IP sen

Re: [mailop] Low Volume Senders

When I cut my sending infrastructure back from a /22 to a /24, I noticed reputation improvements pretty well across the board. That mainly being because with a /22, no single IP sent enough email to be noteworthy. This is fairly recent for me, and seems to be based on the same theory. On 2021-

[mailop] Low Volume Senders

Poking around their support pages, portals, etc. doesn't give me what I'm looking for, so I thought I would ask. Have Google and Microsoft done anything to resolve their inability for low-volume senders to get out of the blocklists? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions