On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:04 AM Vittorio Bertola <
vittorio.bert...@open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
> > Il 10 aprile 2018 alle 2.15 Brandon Long via mailop
> ha scritto:
> >
> >
> > Google does not yet trust third party ARC signatures, yes. We're open
> to manually
> > adding some as they become avai
> Il 10 aprile 2018 alle 2.15 Brandon Long via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
>
> Google does not yet trust third party ARC signatures, yes. We're open to
> manually
> adding some as they become available, but overall, it's a chicken and egg
> thing
> so far, there aren't enough of them yet for us
In article
you write:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to
>specifically only use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I
>guess.
More likely their mail comes from a lot of places with hostile mail
admins, and while the overall admins
In article you write:
>Sometimes I'm thinking DMARC should have enforced DKIM, and not allowed
>to have only a match in {SPF, DKIM}, because it leads to issues like
>broken-DKIM working-SPF domains not noticing things are wrong even
>though they *are*…
That was ADSP. It was even worse than DMARC
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:55 PM Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 01:04 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
> > We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to
> > specifically only
> > use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess.
> >
> > With ARC, you can actually "pa
On 04/10/2018 01:04 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
> We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to
> specifically only
> use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess.
>
> With ARC, you can actually "pass" the SPF pass through the forwarder.
>
> Not that there's a
We've also seen various banks and other large companies who seem to
specifically only
use SPF with DMARC, as a way of disallowing forwarding, I guess.
With ARC, you can actually "pass" the SPF pass through the forwarder.
Not that there's anywhere near wide enough acceptance of ARC to make that
yo
On 04/09/2018 08:45 PM, Jesse Thompson wrote:> Kinda, yes. Anyone
running a non-compliant list server should look to
> how other list servers are making themselves compliant. Could be...
> 1) rewrite headers
> 2) not break DKIM
> 3) ARC?
> I don't want to be overly prescriptive (no one in academi
