Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

> On Jun 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, John Levine wrote: > > In article <9bd40d9d-1c4f-4859-8169-d270d2811...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >>> https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ >> >> That doesn’t distinguish between forensic and summary reports, I don’t >> think.

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

In article <9bd40d9d-1c4f-4859-8169-d270d2811...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >> https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ > >That doesn’t distinguish between forensic and summary reports, I don’t think. >It just says “XML” Aggregate reports are XML, forensic repor

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

In article you write: >You mean something like this (2,850 entries): > >https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ No, that's XML aggregate reports. R's, John ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mail

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

> On Jun 8, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Matt Vernhout wrote: > > You mean something like this (2,850 entries): > > https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ That doesn’t distinguish between forensic and summary reports, I don’t think. It just says “XML” laura > > Che

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

You mean something like this (2,850 entries): https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/ Cheers, Matt On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Gil Bahat via mailop wrote: > I believe Tim draegan from DMARCian would probably have all of them > covered in between his clients and so will Agari and Returnpath. The

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

I believe Tim draegan from DMARCian would probably have all of them covered in between his clients and so will Agari and Returnpath. They might be willing to share. On Jun 8, 2017 21:24, "Laura Atkins" wrote: Thank you to everyone who responded! On Jun 8, 2017, at 10:33 AM, John Levine wrote:

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

In article <55507ff5-0daf-41a9-9c5e-093b23805...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >> If people want, I can make a summary of the addresses that have sent >> them to me and we can swap them around. I have about 62000 reports. > >Sounds like work. But if the list gets generated, I’ll take a copy :) He

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

Thank you to everyone who responded! > On Jun 8, 2017, at 10:33 AM, John Levine wrote: > > In article you write: >> Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? > > Other than sending broken DMARC and seeing who reports back (as noted, > mailing lists are a go

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

In article you write: >Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? Other than sending broken DMARC and seeing who reports back (as noted, mailing lists are a good start) I'm not aware of any. If people want, I can make a summary of the addresses that have sent t

Re: [mailop] DMARC forensic reports

Posting to mailing lists that don't implement a DMARC work-around from a DMARC protected domain is a quick and dirty way to do a poll. From experience, while a few providers are sending forensic reports, many send fairly frequent aggregate reports which may also serve your purpose.  Ken. Need t

[mailop] DMARC forensic reports

Is there a way to find out / determine who is sending DMARC forensic reports? laura -- Having an Email Crisis? 800 823-9674 Laura Atkins Word to the Wise la...@wordtothewise.com (650) 437-0741 Email Delivery Blog: http://wordtothewise.com/blog