Re: [mailop] Congratulations to the authors of ARC - RFC 8617

In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hi, > >I just want to congratulate the authors of RFC 8617 >(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8617) - for making this >far with a new standard in such a short time. It's a nice spec but it is not a standard. Look at the top of th

Re: [mailop] Congratulations to the authors of ARC - RFC 8617

Sealing at all would be a good start - doing it correctly really helps too :-) On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:58 AM Seth Blank via mailop wrote: > Thank you! > > Now we just need to get this list Sealing properly ;-) > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:02 AM Sidsel Jensen via mailop < > mailop@mailop.org>

Re: [mailop] Congratulations to the authors of ARC - RFC 8617

Thank you! Now we just need to get this list Sealing properly ;-) On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:02 AM Sidsel Jensen via mailop wrote: > Hi, > > I just want to congratulate the authors of RFC 8617 ( > https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8617) - for making this far with a new > standard in such a shor

[mailop] Congratulations to the authors of ARC - RFC 8617

Hi, I just want to congratulate the authors of RFC 8617 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8617) - for making this far with a new standard in such a short time. You can read more about the Authenticated Received Chain here: http://arc-spec.org/ It’s such a good step tow