Spam Analysis
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
> Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Mark
> Milhollan
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:48 PM
> To: mailop mail
On 7/31/17 4:21 PM, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote:
Optimizing for connection reuse since the overhead of creating
connections is actually high for us. So we want to send as many messages
as we can over a single connection before closing it.
So do that. When you have no more messages to deliver
mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Mark Milhollan
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:48 PM
> To: mailop
> Subject: Re: [mailop] Concurrent Messages and Proper Time to Keep a
> Connection Open
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Ryan Harris wrote:
>
> >Naturall
t the Junk Mail Reporting
Tool<http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Mark Milhollan
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:48 PM
To: mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Concurrent Messages and
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Ryan Harris wrote:
>Naturally we don't want to cause unrest within the ecosphere by keeping
>connections open for too long.
Have you looked at the related RFCs? (2821 and 1123 primarily but et
seq)
>>It would seem kind of pointless to keep a connection open for 10
>>minu
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2017, at 13:21, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote:
>
> Not that we're the best neighbors in this regard, but we don't reuse
> connections for the vast majority of endpoints, just the highest by volume,
> and we only keep connections ope
On 31 Jul 2017, at 13:21, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote:
Not that we're the best neighbors in this regard, but we don't reuse
connections for the vast majority of endpoints, just the highest by
volume,
and we only keep connections open for potential reuse for 30s.
Have you considered turning
I suggest “as short as possible” - 10, maybe 20 seconds with no mail?
laura
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 1:21 PM, Ryan Harris via mailop wrote:
>
>
> What are you optimizing for? Connection time/overhead?
>
> Optimizing for connection reuse since the overhead of creating connections is
> actua
What are you optimizing for? Connection time/overhead?
Optimizing for connection reuse since the overhead of creating connections
is actually high for us. So we want to send as many messages as we can over
a single connection before closing it.
Naturally we don't want to cause unrest within the
5 seconds :)
Really, opening a new connection is normally faster than that, and some
email endpoints might have a limited amount of SMTP sessions, so why hog
them when someone else can use them..
A Polite 'neighbour' would not hold it open 1 second longer than is
necessary...
On 17-07-31
What are you optimizing for? Connection time/overhead?
It would seem kind of pointless to keep a connection open for 10 minutes to
save 2s of connection time, for example.
Not that we're the best neighbors in this regard, but we don't reuse
connections for the vast majority of endpoints, just th
Hello,
I was curious if anyone had documentation or knew appropriate times to keep
an SMTP connection open and when to close that connection. Would connecting
via telnet to an ISP and watching when that connection closes, be the
source of truth on how long an SMTP connection should be lasting with
12 matches
Mail list logo
