> It's too bad a lot of legitimate mail burps out of the likes of
> Sendgrid, Mailgun, Salesforce, etc., because the easiest thing to do
> would be to block their platforms entirely...
Just received one today as usual with false docusign...
I am thinkinkg of doing a reject on my mail servers for
Hello,
>> I'm wondering what SpamAssassin rule to boost, but it seems like this
>> operator
>> has mostly covered their bases? KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ might be worth boosting.
>
> We have seen an increase of spam and phishing emails from Google Groups since
> 21.08. It seems the spammers are adding lar
Hello,
> Same situation here, Microsoft suddenly blocking our main server for all
> M365 domains with the same 5.7.511 error code. No indications on what
> could have possibly triggered the issue. All DMARC reports are clean, no
> marketing emails, no known hacked accounts, no clear suspects. The
Hello,
Mostly on the same topic : M$ vs rest of the world, now receiving mail from
these guys
Seems that M$ is fscked with starttls :
Oct 26 05:40:57 mx2 postfix/smtpd[44098]: connect from
mail-bn8nam04on2061.outbound.protection.outlook.com[40.107.100.61]
Oct 26 05:40:57 mx2 postfix/smtpd[
Hello,
> why bother to self host an email? using gmail/gsuite save a lot of time.
Until you have your country blocked by Google or some "law" stuff.
Or... got banned by Google because of any stupid algorithm ...
Regards,
Xavier
___
mailop mailing list
Hello,
>> Gmail certainly receives an order of magnitude more spam attempts
>> each day than all of the email that gmail sends. So, no, we are
>> not the biggest source by volume.
>
> Maybe I should have said that Gmail is perceived as the largest source
> of spam by volume.
>
> I know that t
Hello,
About @laposte.net, afaik this thing is more or less in abandonware with french
post.
Maybe you can try reach some french administrators on frnog mailing list.
Regards,
Xavier
> De: "mailop"
> À: "mailop"
> Envoyé: Mardi 11 Janvier 2022 02:05:09
> Objet: [mailop] Anyone from @t-on
Hello,
>
> Do your logs show which gmail server received each message ?
>
> I hypothesize that different server(-cluster)s have different databases
> and some of them do not know you so default to unclean.
Seems maybe this is a misunderstanding of gmail / google about tld eu.org.
If subdomain
Hi Stephen,
Seems there is more @free.fr admin on frnog mailing list...
Kind regards,
- Mail original -
> De: "mailop"
> À: "mailop"
> Envoyé: Vendredi 6 Août 2021 17:31:39
> Objet: [mailop] free.fr / tdsnet.com / zeelandnet.nl bounces
> Greetings,
>
> We have quite a few folks with @
Hello,
>> But it seems they never trys the best preference first.
>>
>
> Are you greylisting or running pregreet tests on your MXes?
>
> Here's what I think is happening. MS first tries the priority 10 MX,
> and postscreen (or such) issues some tests that delay the transaction,
> so then M
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 12:38:34PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote:
>> Well it seems that RFC974 is deprecated and replaced by RFC 5321, section
>> 5.1.
>> "MX
>> records contain a preference indication that MUST be used in sorting
>> if more t
Hello,
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 09:44:38PM +0200, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>> Regarding RFC974
>>If the list of MX RRs is not empty, the mailer SHOULD try to deliver
>>the message to the MXs in order (lowest preference value tried
>>first). The mailer IS REQUIRED to attempt de
Hello,
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2021, Xavier Beaudouin via mailop wrote:
>
>> domain.tld. IN MX 0 mx1.domain.tld.
>
>> Why on hell they persist and sign to send mail ONLY on mx2 ? (all MX are
>> unfortunatly on same AS, so no this is not routing issues).
>
>
Hello,
Another good work from Microsoft that still send mail to the MX with the HIGH
weight, instead of lower weight...
Did they use the same techniques as spammer to send their mail... Really they
are brain damaged...
Exemple :
domain.tld. IN MX 0 mx1.domain.tld.
domain.tld. IN MX 1000 mx2.do
>> It trys about 31 times But they didn't had the idea to check the mx1...
>> which is ready for relay.
>
> You can't tell for certain that they didn't check the mx1.
Well absolutly NO connection for this domain on mx1... according to the logs.
And I had some reports about some similars prob
Hello there,
I have a setup with 2 MX :
domain.tld mx 10 mx1.domain.tld
domain.tld mx 30 mx3.domain.tld
For some operational reason mx3 replys all mail with a 454 which is TEMPORALY
error... :
Jun 14 23:22:55 mx3 postfix/smtpd[83891]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
mail-eopbgr50127.outbound.prot
16 matches
Mail list logo