I wouldn't offer anything other than one of those two *especially* as they are
tech challenged.
Unless you want a job for life that is...
September 7, 2021 10:47 AM, "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop"
wrote:
> All,
>
> I know someone who is setting up a business domain, and needs an inbox h
last I heard the ip blocklists worked at /64 granularity
Had one provider dole them out singly...
February 26, 2021 12:48 PM, "Andrew C Aitchison via mailop"
wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021, Michael Wise via mailop wrote:
>
>> https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866&clcid
>
> Hmm. No
Oh dear,
/dev/nvme2n1 on /data/mongodb type ext4 (rw,noatime)
( yeah I only run it on ec2 ) but not a word of complaint.
https://scalegrid.io/blog/xfs-vs-ext4-comparing-mongodb-performance-on-aws-ec2
Given average performance of linode disks - not a complaint, I'm a happy linode
user - switchi
Migration for a start
December 18, 2020 10:28 AM, "John Levine via mailop" wrote:
> As we all know, MX records have a priority number, and mail senders
> are supposed to try the highest priority/lowest number servers first,
> then fall back to the lower priority.
>
> I understand why secondary
Anecdotal, but last time I delved deep into this, apparently the majority of
spam was sent via IPv6
December 19, 2019 12:16 PM, "Brian via mailop" wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 13:44 -0800, Mark Milhollan via mailop wrote:
>
>> IPv6 is normally preferred so if you have published an for t
Still on sendmail... not wasting those 10's of thousands of hours!
December 6, 2019 1:03 PM, "Brielle via mailop" wrote:
> I use Exim, and have been for a lng time. The multi-file config package
> in Debian is quite nice
> and makes it easy to configure and customize.
>
> On 12/5/2019 4:36
Well, we did leave Amazon SES a couple of years ago, and I haven't used them
since. Just like my views on KDE, it was crap at version 1, so I've never used
since (:
Steve
December 3, 2019 2:45 PM, "Michael Peddemors via mailop"
wrote:
> On 2019-12-02 4:53 p.m., St
December 3, 2019 1:46 PM, "Luis E. Muñoz via mailop" wrote:
> On 2 Dec 2019, at 15:59, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>
>> I warned a guy away from Hetzner and OVH if he wants to send mail so > he
>> reasonably asked what VPS provider in Europe is better for sending > mail.
>>
>> Any suggestions
We found no way, and in the end migrated high hundreds of customers to an
alternative service. It was a mind blowingly tedious chore, but 2 years on
we're glad we did it.
Steve
August 12, 2019 7:33 PM, "Benoit Panizzon via mailop" wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Amazon AWS SES Support drives me and the
I think you may be missing the point here ( apologies if this has already been
mentioned ). Because you, the sender have no control at all on the recipients
actions, it is only an indication...
As an example, the SPF record is often used to evaluate the sender's domain,
whereas it should only b
my control, which is a relief for me as it looks
like I've set everything up correctly.
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Holdoway BSc(Hons) MIITP
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/steveholdoway
Skype: sholdowa
___
mail
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 20:09 -0700, Jay Hennigan wrote:
> On 3/16/15 6:38 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 01:27 +, Franck Martin wrote:
>
> >> Are you saying your hosting provider gave your a /128 instead of a /64 ?
> >>
> >
> > Yes
s-2014-09.pdf
>
> And oh, use things like spamhaus DBL, SURBL and NOD (URIBL?) to block the
> domains you find in SPF/DKIM/RFC5321.mailfrom/RFC5322.From/...
>
>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> ht
n here... and some things
have to stay onshore.
--
Steve Holdoway BSc(Hons) MIITP
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/steveholdoway
Skype: sholdowa
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
ding a naked 'a' in the SPF record refers to the A record for '@'
> in the zone. How is the receiving mail server to query for all A and
> records for a given domain? It's not too common to allow AXFR queries from
> all of the public internet...
But you ha
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 01:27 +, Franck Martin wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 5:36 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote:
>
> > I wish to thank google personnel who contacted me privately and
> > indicated that the subnet that I'm sending from has a poor reputation.
> >
&g
n't it?
>
> That's why I included this part:
>
> >> You should be covered, however, by the "mx" part of your SPF record, given
> >> that the MX for abcs.co.nz is mailserver.abcs.co.nz., and that *does* have
> >> a of 2403:7000:8000:
by the "mx" part of your SPF record, given
> that the MX for abcs.co.nz is mailserver.abcs.co.nz., and that *does* have
> a of 2403:7000:8000:700::34.
>
> --
> Hugo
>
> -----Original Message-
> >Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:03:33 +1300
> >Fr
rd Cunningham, MCP
> howa...@macrollc.com - personal
> For technical support, send an email to serv...@macrollc.com or call
> 703-359-9211 (24/7)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Steve Holdoway
> Sent: Monday,
ding that a includes with an SPF record. The
specific IP address is a fallback in case we need to use a separate
server - irrespective of whether it's in the same domain.
>
> -Dave
If I'm wrong, please let me know!
Steve
--
Steve Holdoway BSc(Hons) MIITP
http://www.greeng
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 14:50 -0700, Laura Atkins wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Steve Holdoway wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Not sure if this is appropriate but it's driving me insane. Have set up
> > a smarthost for a local domain. It adds a valid DKIM
gt; On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Steve Holdoway
> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Not sure if this is appropriate but it's driving me insane.
> Have set up
> a smarthost for a local domain. It adds a valid DKIM header
> and DKIM,
&g
pam? It's similar to messages that have been
detected by our spam filters'
Do any of you have any idea what else I can do? I'm at my wits end!
Steve
--
Steve Holdoway BSc(Hons) MIITP
http://www.greengecko.co.nz
Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.c
23 matches
Mail list logo
