In message , Gellner, Oliver via mailop
writes
>As mentioned by Robert this is not coming from Google Workspace but Google
>Groups. As far as I have understood it, spammers create or hijack newsgroups,
>add countless addresses to the groups and then send their spam to the groups
>addresses.
>
In message ,
Michael Denney via mailop writes
>The instances of this we've seen - aren't actually phishing, just fraud.
>
>Generating invoices via PayPal to an o365 address that then forwards that out
>to
>the final recipient.
In some cases ... where phone numbers are present, then ringing tha
In message , Paul
Menzel via mailop writes
>Since this week I got some emails from Gmail with just an emoji in the
>body.
...
>Does somebody have more insight if they tried to make it a standard, and
>failed, so went on without one?
there is an "experimental" RFC9078. I understand, from dis
In message <20240818173004.ga27...@rafa.eu.org>, Jaroslaw Rafa via
mailop writes
>> and thereafter (at
>> Yahoo anyway) further email from that sending address will go in the
>> inbox no matter what the machine learning system thinks overall.
>
>I had that exact problem with Google once. My mess
In message <20240818152433.ga27...@rafa.eu.org>, Jaroslaw Rafa via
mailop writes
>Yeah, that's the typical "dead loop" problem of mistaken spam
>classifications. Your mail gets mistakenly classified as spam, so the
>recipient doesn't see it in inbox and doesn't know the mail has arrived
>(most us
In message , Ferris,
Rhys (SCC) via mailop writes
>In the last 24 hours we have received 693,937 emails
>from select freemail domains with top senders having sent between 500 and 800
>emails in a single day. This has been ongoing and in the last 30 days we have
>received 23,196,000+ emails fro
In message <484dfe5a-71e7-4851-8de0-fe35342cff97@spamtrap.tnetconsulting
.net>, Grant Taylor via mailop writes
>Is there any value in contacting postmaster@ / abuse@ for senders that
>participated in a mass subscription bomb attack?
this is "list bombing" and is done to simply annoy, or more of
In message ,
Tobias Fiebig via mailop writes
>My point here is, that 'deliverability' is often more of a priority for
>ESPs than 'following all documents to the letter'. Granted, for the
>bigger ones, usually more like 'outbound deliverability' than 'inbound
>deliverability', though.
>
>Hence
In message <6104b9876b594050d36ca90ca6a169cda7a8e684.ca...@fiebig.nl>,
Tobias Fiebig via mailop writes
>A bit of digging found several end-user reports of the following MO:
>
>- Get phished
>- Something expensive is bought
>- Mailbox is overflown right when the notification of the transaction
>co
In message <65860e95.20895.448c...@postmaster.inter-corporate.com>,
Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop writes
> Would you mind sending me a linjk to your thesis? That's an
>interesting topic, and based on what you've written I get the
>impression that you have a lot more experienc
In message <6585e535.11582.3a72...@postmaster.inter-corporate.com>,
Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop writes
>> The most commonly seen method of tracking is probably inclusion of
>> specifically crafted links in the message, that refer to a tracking server
>> run by the sender, so the sen
In message , Byron Lunz via mailop writes
>We've required confirmed-opt-in for years. But a few months ago, I noticed
>that our servers were sending out hundreds of 'confirmation required'
>messages every day. They were going to obviously-bogus addresses, likely
>submitted to our submission forms
In message , Matt
Corallo via mailop writes
>
>
>On 10/23/23 3:26 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
>> However, all this discussion is hardly related to email, as - as many have
>> noted - there's hardly any certificate checking at all between MTAs.
>
>Indeed, MTAs mostly use DNSSEC/DANE which
In message <07d58480-7dde-4d15-a5ca-5bb6c8e10...@mtasv.net>, Matt Palmer
via mailop writes
>The relative "noisiness" of the attack, in fact, is a fairly strong signal
>that it *isn't* lawful intercept; western law enforcement agencies are
>typically very hesitant to do anything that could "tip of
In message <56b83491-6441-4d1e-a3ef-008da3311...@slavino.sk>, Slavko via
mailop writes
>When spammers are able to create proper DNS records directly used
>in email authentification, what problem will be the SOA record for them?
In order to have a domain with an SOA record they have to purchase a
In message <601b01c7-1475-32e0-5aba-e595272e9...@tnetconsulting.net>,
Grant Taylor via mailop writes
>My concern is that Yahoo / AOL isn't creating an arbitrary "every domain
>must have an SOA record" and completely loosing sight of the fact that
>SOAs belong to the /zone/ apex and are not asso
In message <20230709223922.dd59afd9f...@ary.qy>, John Levine via mailop
writes
>A friend of mine wants to set up a mail server on a VPS and asked me what
>he needs to do beyond the obvious setting up postfix and dovecot. Is there
>a good summary somewhere?
not that I know of -- arguably there s
17 matches
Mail list logo
