and DKIM results become
irrelevant, right ? So why bother having SPF and DKIM in the first place ?
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 1:19 PM Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 6/17/2022 6:17 AM, Paulo Pinto via mailop wrote:
> > tldr; what ARC tries to address is already correctly handled by
tldr; what ARC tries to address is already correctly handled by
DKIM/SPF/DMARC if used as designed.
IMHO ARC seems to be a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.
The message passes through your network and you make changes to it in the
process ? Sign it with DKIM on your edge/"last hop" server
t directly. I don't think that would be a high
> priority, however.
>
> When we rolled out the SPF checking for POP3, the rate of false positives
> for spam handling for that mail stream improved significantly. I'm not
> sure if anyone has done a recent evaluation of it.
&g
ail
client.
If this isn't wrong ...
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:09 PM Noel Butler via mailop
wrote:
> On 14/04/2022 01:02, Paulo Pinto via mailop wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Why on earth is gmail checking the IP address of the message sender (ISP
> assigned home address, for
Hi all.
Why on earth is gmail checking the IP address of the message sender (ISP
assigned home address, for instance) against the sender's domain SPF
without the ability of checking if that original delivery was done using
SMTP authentication ( hence voiding the need for that IP being part of the
