On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 7:14 PM Matt Palmer via mailop
wrote:
> That's something to talk to your ESP about. They're in charge of retrying.
Christine *is* the ESP.
Kids these days.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listi
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 6:22 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
> But even if one such message goes through, is this really a problem?
Yes, it certainly can be. If an email causes a user to install
ransomware on a corporate network, then it is an enormous and
expensive problem; it's put companie
The answers to most of these issues would be found in A/B testing.
Test each element separately--queue up a list of variables, and test
each in turn. IME, the answers are different for each industry/list.
--Kelly
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:31 PM Damon via mailop wrote:
>
> I have asked around and
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 6:50 AM Ralf Hildebrandt via mailop
wrote:
>
> * Mathieu Bourdin :
> > Hi again,
> >
> >
>
> > First, a precision: my reply is missing 2 lines wich, for short,
> > were saying: "but usually you don't get listed on the first sending to
> > a trap,
>
> Yes, because that would
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:51 AM, John Levine wrote:
> COI is a useful tool but it is not a magic bullet. People abandon
> their mailboxes and even though it doesn't bounce and nobody
> complains, nobody's reading it either. Also, companies change.
My favorite story about that is back when I wa
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>>
> That makes sense if you get no response from the affected sender. However,
> if they are able to show you how the problem was fixed then what's the
> purpose? Especially when you already have reputation data for that sender
> over long time pe
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:00 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
>
>
> So if you're goal is to solve problems, then what's the point of having a
> minimum 48 hour block when the problem is solved at the origin within
> minutes? That's just punitive and not constructive.
Because the proof of the pudding is in th
