Re: [mailop] Storing 821 envelope recipients in an 822.Header?

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:00:28AM +1000, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > David Hofstee wrote: > > The X- type headers are deprecated... https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648 > > > Oh now there's a bad idea if ever I heard one... > > :/ > wow, missed that one :-/ -- Gilles Chehade https://www.pool

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:54:43PM +, Michael Wise wrote: > > If it's Hotmail, it's almost certainly an IP specific issue. Open a ticket > ok thanks ! > > From: Gilles Chehade > Sent: ?9/?21/?2016 6:31 AM > To: Michael Wise

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 06:32:45AM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > The following paste is a trace from the mta engine starting right after > > STARTTLS is established: > > > >http://pastebin.com/VY8zxcjQ > > > > > > The following paste is a complete copy paste of the raw

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:16:47PM +, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: > > The headers in particular. sent in another mail to the thread the two pastebins > And is this to Hotmail, et al or Office365? > only complaints i've received where about hotmail and this is where I reproduce the issue

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 05:49:48AM -0700, Steve Atkins wrote: > > > On Sep 21, 2016, at 4:02 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if there is something wrong in the format of our headers > > and if this could affect users of our software disregarding the kind > > of mails they se

Re: [mailop] anyone from Microsoft around ?

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:56:14AM +, Eric Henson wrote: > http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=614866&clcid > Thanks, I was aware of this link however I'm more worried about a problem not necessarily tied to my own case. Another user using his own setup also gets spamboxed when mailing m