r just a Hotmail thing?
Speaking as someone being dragged kicking and screaming from on-prem
Exchange to a subdomain of our beloved corporate overlords' O365 tenant,
this is the sort of thing I have nightmares about.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herde
there I can opt
out or not depending on how useful I perceive the content to be.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
to contractor's
example.com address" and "message sent from random spammer to contractor's
Generic, Inc. address and then forwarded to contractor's example.com
address"?
Thanks in advance for any help.
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
___
>EIG? I wouldn't hold my breath. They've been scooping up various small
>and
>medium sized mail providers and they're pretty incoherent.
>
>The good news is that since it's from EIG, the chances that the
>message was one that your user would regret missi
r VERP fixed?
3) If 1) is incorrect, does anybody have suggestions for telling Exchange
2013 to be more liberal in what it accepts?
I know I can attack this with header rewriting rules in Exim if it comes
to that, but I'd rather get the problem fixed than paper it over if
possible.
Any sugg
budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
--
Dave Pooser
Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com
_