If you had any honest question here, you got it wrong by laying on the
insult and making leading statements. Since you are acting like a
troll, I think we should treat you like a troll and tell you to go
away.
I get so many spams, but I have not gotten a spam from a Mailchimp
customer for as long
Dear whole internet, Anni got a spam? I beg you, please do not turn
this into SDLU.
Is this an operational issue ? Is a system down ?
They sent many millions of spams and the ISP ignored your report for
many months ?
No? Then...
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Anne P. Mitchell Esq.
wrote:
> I
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> It means they should have stuck to BSD and sendmail. ;)
Now somebody else will pop up and tell them to submit a ticket and
they will reply that they have submitted 6 tickets and Microsoft isn't
responding to them.
SOMETHING IS BADLY BROKEN OV
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Ken O'Driscoll via mailop
wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 11:14 +1100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
>> One can only conclude, they either have a leak in their API, or they
>> altered the permissions to give out emails when specifically denied, or
>> they got hacked and
On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 9:51 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article
> you
> write:
>>See RFC 2142: "3. BUSINESS-RELATED MAILBOX NAMES
>>
>> These names are related to an organization's line-of-business
>> activities." …
>>
>>"SUPPORTCustomer ServiceProblems with product or service"
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 9 Jan 2018, at 14:53, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
>
>> Also, another user here reported that recently Microsoft introduced
>> automations so that an user moving messages from inbox to spam via
>> IMAP (also in bulk) automatically create abuse report
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
>> Did you try it with a non-"trouble.is" domain?
>
> Yes. I sent these from postmaster@ the several domains where the spamtraps
> are hosted and from philip@ in the domains I've got mailboxes in. Always
> the same error: "Message rejected as
Glad to hear that. Thank you for sharing. It is not always easy to
tell what is going on from the outside.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Scott Undercofler wrote:
> Yes. We are much smarter than that.
>
>
>> On Dec 18, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Charles McKean
>> wrote:
>
Or, perhaps TWC has made the very questionable choice to implement
SORBS on a real ISP mail server. That would be one way to hold down
load. Just randomly block a whole bunch of IP addresses that aren't
actually spam sources.
The people at TWC are smarter than this, yes? Please tell me it isn't so
Legal? Was that a threat? Do you have prior experience attacking a
lunatic asylum with a banana? Best of luck.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Emre Üst |euro.message|
wrote:
> Hello Michael ,
>
> Your support team no longer answers the tickets. We still keep getting the
> 4xx error as server busy
> 2017-11-08 21:46 GMT+02:00 Brandon Long via mailop :
>> GSuite users can also denote a host as an inbound gateway to get around this
>> problem, but I was never able to get the resources to have gmail users have
>> the same ability. It's possible this is something we could use arc for.
I humb
11 matches
Mail list logo
