Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

Hellow Slavko, On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 08:10 +, Slavko via mailop wrote: > Dňa 27. januára 2024 3:59:54 UTC používateľ Byung-Hee HWANG via > mailop napísal: > > > > > Google Gmail accept such email: (source from soyeo...@gmail.com) > > https://git

Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

Hellow Oliver, On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 22:06 +, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: > > > On 25.01.2024 at 16:29 Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > > > > At work we are currently deploying DKIM. > > > > Do people here have experience with messages from sub.example.org > > signed with d=example.org

Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

Hellow Jörg, On Fri, 2024-01-26 at 10:49 +0100, Jörg Backschues via mailop wrote: > Am 25.01.24 um 23:58 schrieb Anne Mitchell via mailop: > > > > On Jan 25, 2024, at 3:24 PM, Byron Lunz via mailop > > > wrote: > > > > > > Or, you can use https://aboutmy.email/ - not affiliated, just a > > > pl

Re: [mailop] [EXTERNAL] Re: MTA-STS: No TLS reports from Google since January 9th

Hellow Alex, On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 19:55 +, Brotman, Alex via mailop wrote: > I did start getting reports again, I haven't looked to see if they're > consistently appearing > Me too. Also i received again that reports from Google, today! Sincerely, Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//

Re: [mailop] Extortion spam from OVH-hosted *.sbs domains

Hellow Jaroslaw, On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 10:13 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote: > Dnia 25.01.2024 o godz. 07:10:13 Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop pisze: > > It's probably pointless to call for a general OVH boycott, as much > > as I > > would like to do that :-) > > I would be the first to obj

Re: [mailop] DKIM signed with parent domain

Hellow Marco, On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 16:17 +0100, Marco Moock via mailop wrote: > Hello! > > At work we are currently deploying DKIM. > > Do people here have experience with messages from sub.example.org > signed with d=example.org? > That way is much easier to handle for us because we have a lot

Re: [mailop] MTA-STS: No TLS reports from Google since January 9th

On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 15:26 +0100, Paul Menzel via mailop wrote: > Dear mail operators, > > > Am 17.01.24 um 10:04 schrieb Paul Menzel via mailop: > > > Since January 9th, 2024 we have not received any (MTA-STS) TLS > > reports > > from google.com (noreply-smtp-tls-report...@google.com). We sti

Re: [mailop] Merry Christmas from Google?

> That depends on the setting of the forwarder. Some organizations use > aliases for forwarding, Envelope-Sender won't change in that case > unless other rulesets change it. Yes, that is true: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1043539#88 Sincerely, Byung-Hee _

Re: [mailop] Noticed Google now suggests changing envelope sender for forwarding

> "no auth, no entry" This is it, thanks! Sincerely, Byung-Hee ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Microsoft Office365 not rejecting emails when instructed so by SPF recored?

> (...) > If you ask me - a better solution would be to do away with forwarding > completely and incorporate POP checks, like Gmail does. This alleviates > all of the issues with forwarding mail in relation to SPF and DKIM. > (...) There are sevral projects using forwarding. The Debian Project

Re: [mailop] Forwarding mail originating from gmail via 3rd party to gmail

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 05:25:36PM -0700, Brandon Long via mailop wrote: > (...) > > I know some mailing list software does modify messages in order to defeat > the duplicate detection in > Gmail. The duplicate detection requires that the date, "clean" subject and > messageid are identical. > The

Re: [mailop] Yahoo: SOA record per subdomain required?!

Ken Peng via mailop writes: > May 9, 2023 at 4:07 AM, "Gellner, Oliver via mailop" > wrote: > > >> >> If a receiver only accepts emails from sender addressed domains for which MX >> or A records exist (such checks are performed by many receiving servers), it >> means a sender has to 1. set up

Re: [mailop] SPF behavior on email forwarding

Lou Katz via mailop writes: > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 11:20:22AM -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote: >> It appears that Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop said: >> >Dnia 14.04.2023 o godz. 14:11:49 Slavko via mailop pisze: >> >> In other words, SPF check is not something what helps with SPAM >> >> here,

Re: [mailop] forwarding to gmail - problem

Byung-Hee HWANG via mailop writes: > ... snip ... > Most emails arrive at INBOX (soyeo...@gmail.com), exactly. There is only 0.1%'s email to spam folder. 99.9%'s emails settle down INBOX without error. Another screenshot: (2022-05-03) <https://gitlab.com/soy

Re: [mailop] forwarding to gmail - problem

Dear Geoff, Geoff Mulligan via mailop writes: > (... thanks ...) > If so, how is someone supposed to forward messages to gmail??? This is mine: [0] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/karma/DKIM/ss/87ilrewnoo@gnus.org [1] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/blob/karma/DKIM/ss/Screenshot

Re: [mailop] Troubleshooting MTA-STS reports

> Google might not be sending inter-domain reports > since your hosted there. Maybe True. So Jesse is good with "jesse+someth...@mbuki-mvuki.org" instead of "postmas...@mbuki-mvuki.org". And this is mine:

Re: [mailop] Increase in virus activity this week @ MXroute (perhaps others?)

(... sorry for top-posting ...) Dear Jarland, In the whole story, i feel that you are NICE guy! NICE(= faithful + technical + reasonable) Thanks ^^^ Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee Jarland Donnell via mailop writes: > It's a good topic, and one I'm fairly passionate about. Obviously at > smal

Re: [mailop] DKIM by the third party

Dear Brandon, Brandon Long via mailop writes: > Generally speaking, > adding a dkim signature to your message adds a "source" anchor, > something that ties a message to other messages. INDEED, i love this statement so much! Thanks ^^^ Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^)

Re: [mailop] DKIM by the third party

Henrik S via mailop writes: > (... thanks ...) > does this DKIM have helps to the authorization of my outgoing messages? The answer is "case by case". And i'm doing that [^^^] for forwarding (to Gmail). Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee [^^^] test screenshot with forwarding to gmail:

Re: [mailop] FYI - Google/Gmail hard enforcing SPF presence

Dear Andre, Andre van Eyssen via mailop writes: > (... thanks ...) > A little testing shows that gmail appears to be rejecting all mail > from domains with no SPF record. Having them create the SPF record > returned their domains to deliverability in about an hour. Well i have no SPF records. S

Re: [mailop] does ESP have the preference for email domains

Dear wilson, wilson via mailop writes: > Hello > > some people told me not to use .xyz domain b/c it's more spammers liked. > may I ask if the big ESP or the open antispam policies have the > preference on domains? such as com/net/org is preferred, but > xyz/top/pro is not. Well i have no troub

Re: [mailop] [E] $GOOG

Al Iverson via mailop writes: > (... thanks ...) > PPS- Don't send to Gmail over IPv6. Very useful tip, to me! Thanks ^^^ Sincerely, Linux fan Byung-Hee -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))// ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/

Re: [mailop] Best mailbox provider for personal domain?

Tara Natanson via mailop writes: > (...thanks...) > (assuming I have no desire to run my own server) > > Thanks in advance for any recommendations! In this Earth, there is no free chagre for my own domain. Still Google Workspace will be good value for money. > Tara Natanson Sincerely, Byung-H