Re: [mailop] Different From domain and Reply-To domain

> We have a fair number of clients who do this today and they don't  > experience any deliverability > or filtering issues that we would attribute to having a different > reply-to. If you were to start filtering based on that, you'd be an > outlier. Spamassassin adds points for that. Perhaps it's

[mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

Constant Contact Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell your services? "Save 50% for 2 months"  postmas...@texas.gov, Bryan Bradsby 512.936.2248 DIR/CTS/NOC-IT ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.no

Re: [mailop] Outlook.com and fraud detection checks

; > the following message to list emails: > > > > > > > > > >   This sender failed our fraud detection checks and may not be who they > > > > > >   appear to be. Learn about spoofing http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSpoofi ng > > > At your service, Bryan Bradsby 512.936.2248 DIR/CTS/NOC-IT ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..

> If you see this ... > > X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM > (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM") > > That means we thought it was spam grep SFV:SPM spam/* | wc -l 56 Thank you Michael, that contribution to the community will be useful to us. Bryan Brads