Am 9 Feb 2025 21:32:54 -
schrieb John Levine via mailop :
> If you are interested in reports, accept both zip and gzip. It's not
> hard.
Some sites reject zip, e.g. university Graz.
That's why I am asking what other users of opendmarc experienced.
___
On 9. februára 2025 21:32:54 UTC, John Levine via mailop
wrote:
>Tip: the media type is sometimes wrong so you're better off sniffing the first
>few bytes of the attachment to see what format it is. No, they shouldn't do
>that
>either. But they do.
In Python:
if c_content[:3] == b"\x1f\
According to Alessandro Vesely via mailop :
>> |The extension MUST be "xml" for a plain XML file, or "xml.gz" for an
>> |XML file compressed using GZIP.
>>
>> Is there a special reason for using zip here?
>
>Some early DMARC drafts specified zip. Google obviously developed at those
>times and ne
Because you're not selling spam filtering or reputation data, I don't think it
would be commercial use. On the sign-up page, they also state: "If you are a
non-commercial entity or a small business with low query volumes".
I guess they only really look at query volume in any case, as long as you'r
On Sun 09/Feb/2025 12:06:36 +0100 Marco Moock wrote:
While analyzing rejected DMARC report mails generated by
opendmarc-reports v1.4.2, I noticed that they are generated in zip
instead of gzip.
Some sites reject zip at all.
|The aggregate data MUST be an XML file that SHOULD be subjected to
|GZ
Hello!
FYI: I already posted that on opendmarc-us...@trusteddomain.org, but
nobody replied.
While analyzing rejected DMARC report mails generated by
opendmarc-reports v1.4.2, I noticed that they are generated in zip
instead of gzip.
Some sites reject zip at all.
|The aggregate data MUST be an X
