Re: [mailop] Mandated Email Terms of Service (ToS) announcement

2025-01-28 Thread Scott Q. via mailop
Guessing this ? https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-administration-tests-power-email-every-federal-employee-rcna189126​ On Wednesday, 22/01/2025 at 10:09 Michael via mailop wrote: Not much notice.. that's today.. but if not sharing the sender details, was this simply for 'compl

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop said: > >Thanks. So, if a domain has correct defined mx records only those can be used >and if they are not reachable for any reason there should >never be an attempt to reach the implicit MX RR of the domain. That is correct, although since this is

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA? @@nosign

2025-01-28 Thread Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
Yes thats the only reason I could think of, but unfortunately this is not the case. The sender tried to deliver a normal mail from his mta. I would guess that his firewall or DNS wasn’t working correctly, like Stuart said. Regards Norbert Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 28.01.2025 um 19:50 schrie

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Tue 28/Jan/2025 18:49:01 +0100 Fehlauer, Norbert wrote: Hi, Thanks. So, if a domain has correct defined mx records only those can be used and if they are not reachable for any reason there should never be an attempt to reach the implicit MX RR of the domain. Correct. The reason I'm as

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
Hi, Thanks. So, if a domain has correct defined mx records only those can be used and if they are not reachable for any reason there should never be an attempt to reach the implicit MX RR of the domain. The reason I'm asking is I got NDRs from external senders (a few days apart from each other)

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread Stuart Henderson via mailop
On 2025/01/28 16:55, Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop wrote: > Hi, > > if a domain has no mx record than a fallback to A/ for the domain is > possible. Is this fallback only to happen when no mx record exists for the > domain or can this fallback happen when no connection to the mx defined > se

Re: [mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025, Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop wrote: > if a domain has no mx record than a fallback to A/ for the > domain is possible. It's not just "possible", it's required to check. > Is this fallback only to happen when no mx record exists Yes. See RFC 5321. 5.1. Locating the Ta

[mailop] Fallback to A/AAAA?

2025-01-28 Thread Fehlauer, Norbert via mailop
Hi, if a domain has no mx record than a fallback to A/ for the domain is possible. Is this fallback only to happen when no mx record exists for the domain or can this fallback happen when no connection to the mx defined servers is possible? I would "guess" that it only should happen if ther