Re: [mailop] Google Rejecting Mails as Spam

2024-10-28 Thread Pete Long via mailop
> On 28 Oct 2024, at 08:06, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 07:48:42AM +, Pete Long wrote: > >>> On 28 Oct 2024, at 05:32, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop >>> wrote: >>> >>> Mind you, why is there a trailing "#" at the end of the "p=" value, >>> that's not a

Re: [mailop] Google Rejecting Mails as Spam

2024-10-28 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop
On Sun 27/Oct/2024 18:35:29 +0100 John Levine via mailop wrote: It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via mailop said: On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 02:16:51PM -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote: I wrote the RFC and I still haven't gotten around to it. I hope you saw my note about returning to SPKI en

Re: [mailop] Google Rejecting Mails as Spam

2024-10-28 Thread Peter via mailop
Thanks Viktor. I ran these commands I found in search result to generate a new DKIM key pair yesterday and the public key does end up with a hash symbol: # openssl genrsa -out valar_dkim_private.pem 2048 # openssl ec -in valar_dkim_private.pem -pubout -outform der | openssl base64 -A openssl

Re: [mailop] Google Rejecting Mails as Spam

2024-10-28 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 07:48:42AM +, Pete Long wrote: > > On 28 Oct 2024, at 05:32, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop > > wrote: > > > > Mind you, why is there a trailing "#" at the end of the "p=" value, > > that's not a valid Base64 character, and is not expected here. The > > correct encoding

Re: [mailop] Google Rejecting Mails as Spam

2024-10-28 Thread Pete Long via mailop
> On 28 Oct 2024, at 05:32, Viktor Dukhovni via mailop > wrote: > > Mind you, why is there a trailing "#" at the end of the "p=" value, > that's not a valid Base64 character, and is not expected here. The > correct encoding is without the trailing "#": > >"v=DKIM1; k=rsa; > p=MIIBIjANBg