It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via mailop said:
>For SUBMIT, the traffic is presumably from your own users, who are
>rarely very far away, and if temporarily on a bad link will try
>again from a better location. So the timeouts on ports 465 and 587
>could be shorter. Whatever your users are unl
Dňa 12. augusta 2024 10:37:25 UTC používateľ Lena--- via mailop
napísal:
>I'm curious: do you get many legitimate connections to tls_on_connect port 465
>(instead of STARTTLS 587)?
All (small number) my real users use 465 port.
>Do you tell your users how to use 587, 465 or both?
I tell them
> From: Slavko
I'm curious: do you get many legitimate connections to tls_on_connect port 465
(instead of STARTTLS 587)?
Do you tell your users how to use 587, 465 or both?
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailo
Dňa 12. augusta 2024 8:20:20 UTC používateľ Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
napísal:
>I think it can be rather different for SMTP and SUBMIT services.
Of course, i am talking about MSA, thus 465/tcp only in my case.
>I'm tempted to propose 30s instead of 300s as still reasonable.
It coresponds wit
My spamd (https://man.openbsd.org/spamd, not the other one) entangled scriptery
just alerted me to this:
Aug 12 09:24:19 skapet spamd[84915]: 45.142.230.249: connected (134/129)
Aug 12 09:24:30 skapet spamd[84915]: (GREY) 45.142.230.249:
-> <66b9b8a2b327e_is_catch-...@bsdly.net>
Aug 12 09:24:30
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 07:34:28AM +, Slavko via mailop wrote:
> Dňa 11. augusta 2024 23:46:43 UTC používateľ Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
> napísal:
>
> >I see some similar traffic (remote disconnects after ~8-30s) on my server:
>
> Please, what would be reasonable TLS handshake timeout now
I don't know why one of our IP is now listed and I'm trying to delist it
but the login procedure needs a passkey on USB if I hit Skip I'm back
to the login screen.
I'm stuck...
thank you
Francesco
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://li
Dňa 11. augusta 2024 23:46:43 UTC používateľ Viktor Dukhovni via mailop
napísal:
>I see some similar traffic (remote disconnects after ~8-30s) on my server:
Please, what would be reasonable TLS handshake timeout nowadays?
I know, it depends, but anyway i consider 5 min (IMO stanfard SMTP timeo