On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:21:29 -0400, "Scott Q. via mailop"
wrote:
>I know it's not easy to handle hundreds of millions ( billions ) of
>e-mail accounts but they should suffer the same consequences as
>everyone else if they can't keep abusers in check.
The system here has an extensive list of loc
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:42:55 -0400, Bill Cole via mailop
wrote:
>As far as I've ever been able to tell, S3150 means "Our Pseudo-AI thinks
>you stink!" and the way out is to find the link on that page for senders
>with problems, jump through the hoops, respond to any requests for
>info, and ev
On 11Jul24, Cody Millard via mailop apparently wrote:
> What is "A RR" ?
Sounds like they're talking about DNS A RRs (Address records).
Circa 1986 the DNS community introduced the MX RR with a view to transitioning
away from
how a mail client would look up an address RR directly for a target dom
On 2024-07-12 10:55, Cody Millard via mailop wrote:
What is "A RR" ?
A resource record.
--
Jeff Pang
jeffp...@aol.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
What is "A RR" ?
On 7/11/2024 9:07 PM, Jeff Pang via mailop wrote:
As a old email provider, safe-mail.net has even no MX records, but
using A RR for incoming messages. do you know why they design this?
for better anti-abuse control?
Thanks.
--
Cody Millard
https://email.broker
_
It appears that Jeff Pang via mailop said:
>As a old email provider, safe-mail.net has even no MX records, but using
>A RR for incoming messages. do you know why they design this? for better
>anti-abuse control?
Most likely they stumbled around decades ago setting up the DNS, found that
worked
As a old email provider, safe-mail.net has even no MX records, but using
A RR for incoming messages. do you know why they design this? for better
anti-abuse control?
Thanks.
--
Jeff Pang
jeffp...@aol.com
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http
Once a company reaches critical mass, they've been allowed to
think they can get away with the bare minimum, or, anything.
That's how MS got hacked and ... did nothing about it until Congress
stepped in and slapped them publicly.
Now, "security" is all that Satya Nadella is talking about at MS
ap
Yes, as we all know.. threat teams and spam filtering teams spend a LOT
of resources on those.. but when you see exactly the same samples year
after year, you have to question their motivation.. (right now 'their'
meaning specifically Gmail and o265)
And 'rejecting' the messages IS possible, b
On 2024-07-12 04:31, Slavko via mailop wrote:
Dňa 11. júla 2024 19:20:23 UTC používateľ John Levine via mailop
napísal:
It appears that Ralph Seichter via mailop said:
Personally, I don't factor the price of domains into the block/pass
decisions,
You should. There is a very strong correlat
Dňa 11. júla 2024 20:01:17 UTC používateľ Jesse Hathaway via mailop
napísal:
>1. Why are the non-delivery notifications sent to
> rather than to ?
NDR have to be send to Return-Path of original message, thus it depends
what was in its MAIL FROM. IMO including foreign (google) IP range open
What irks me is that Gmail's / MS365's IPs never seem to get
blacklisted by Spamhaus for example. Spamcop actually had the courage
to list MS365's because they also send tons of spam and ironically
enough, everyone is upset at Spamcop because how dare they. Yeah, we
should just let these guys get e
There are SO many things wrong with this don't know even where to start..
Received: from shopify.com ([89.190.156.188])
Duplicate Return-Path
X-Original-Message-ID:
<668ef133.170a0220.9c6db.ca0esmtpin_added_bro...@mx.google.com>
(google.com: domain abaimiddle.school.test-google-a.com configure
It appears that Scott Q. via mailop said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Surprisingly, most of the Spam that makes it through these days is
>from Gmail. I'm not sure if they gave up completely on fighting the
>spammers that sign-up but I'm always increasing the score assigned to
>Gmail originating e
On 2024-07-11 at 15:52:53 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 15:52:53 -0400)
Michael W. Lucas via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Just started getting these today. Looks like one of my colo neighbors
behaved badly. No useful info at the suggested link, no contact
given. Any suggestions on how to get my
Dňa 11. júla 2024 19:20:23 UTC používateľ John Levine via mailop
napísal:
>It appears that Ralph Seichter via mailop said:
>>Personally, I don't factor the price of domains into the block/pass
>>decisions,
>
>You should. There is a very strong correlation between cheap and bad.
Of course, mor
On 7/11/2024 3:01 PM, Jesse Hathaway via mailop wrote:
We received a thousand or so of the attached backscatter emails this
morning, each one to a different recipient, but with the same
return-path,. I don't have much experience dealing
with backscatter, so I was hoping for some guidance from thi
Just started getting these today. Looks like one of my colo neighbors
behaved badly. No useful info at the suggested link, no contact
given. Any suggestions on how to get my address unblocked?
host
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com[52.101.68.28] said: 550 5.7.1
Unfortunately, mess
https://sendersupport.olc.protection.outlook.com/snds/
On Thursday, 11/07/2024 at 15:52 Michael W. Lucas via mailop wrote:
Just started getting these today. Looks like one of my colo neighbors
behaved badly. No useful info at the suggested link, no contact
given. Any suggestions on how to ge
Surprisingly, most of the Spam that makes it through these days is
from Gmail. I'm not sure if they gave up completely on fighting the
spammers that sign-up but I'm always increasing the score assigned to
Gmail originating e-mails because of this.
99% of them are SEO offers and whatnot, surely it
We received a thousand or so of the attached backscatter emails this
morning, each one to a different recipient, but with the same
return-path, . I don't have much experience dealing
with backscatter, so I was hoping for some guidance from this list.
Questions:
1. Why are the non-delivery notifi
Just started getting these today. Looks like one of my colo neighbors
behaved badly. No useful info at the suggested link, no contact
given. Any suggestions on how to get my address unblocked?
host
outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com[52.101.68.28] said: 550 5.7.1
Unfortunately, message
Am 11.07.24 um 21:20 schrieb John Levine via mailop:
It appears that Ralph Seichter via mailop said:
Personally, I don't factor the price of domains into the block/pass
decisions,
You should. There is a very strong correlation between cheap and bad.
And there are very rational reasons for t
It appears that Ralph Seichter via mailop said:
>Personally, I don't factor the price of domains into the block/pass
>decisions,
You should. There is a very strong correlation between cheap and bad.
R's,
John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
It appears that Jeff Pang via mailop said:
>This is what claude-3.5-sonnet answered for att email domains.
For reasons already explained, Don't Do That.
I tried the more reliable approach of looking for domains
on the ns1.attdns.com name server:
attdns.net. 172800 in ns ns1.attdn
On 2024-07-10 at 14:44:50 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:44:50 +0800)
Jeff Pang via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Hi
Is there domain name discrimination in the email industry?
Absolutely. Domain names carry reputations. They make it easier to
discriminate between spam and ham. "Discriminat
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024, 3:41 AM Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop
wrote:
> verification of each domain they want to
> register.
>
> The .eu.org free domains have been there since many years and from what I
> know, are rarely abused. But I guess some people immediately stop thinking
> when they hear about "f
Wow... a lot of brands abandoning their branded TLDs. I guess they
realized it may be niche and with potential for confusion and not worth
the upkeep expense.
On 7/11/24 7:01 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via mailop said:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:51:05PM
It appears that Viktor Dukhovni via mailop said:
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:51:05PM -0400, John Levine via mailop wrote:
>
>> I agree that overall, the new TLD program has been a failure and makes
>> a mockery of ICANN's claim to operate as a public charity in the
>> interests of the public.
>
>S
Hello
As a mailop I would like to test every kind of mail system. I know some
old providers are using b1gmail system. B1gmail now has OSS version as
the following link. Does anyone have experience on running/using b1gmail
software? I’d like to know your thoughts on it.
https://github.com/b1g
On 2024-07-10 at 15:10:45 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 03:10:45 +0800)
Jeff Pang via mailop
is rumored to have said:
On 2024-07-11 02:58, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 02:44:50 +0800, Jeff Pang via mailop
wrote:
Is there domain name discrimination in the email industry
Following on from Bill’s comment I would strongly advise the following:
* If someone asks a question on the list and you do not know the answer, DO NOT
turn to *any* generative AI instance, ask the question, and post the output as
an answer - attributed or otherwise.
On another forum in which I
On 2024-07-10 at 15:11:01 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Jul 2024 12:11:01 -0700)
Mark E Jeftovic via mailop
is rumored to have said:
legit crypto
There's some sort of typo there but I'm not sure what you could possibly
have meant by this phrase...
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.or
On 2024-07-10 at 18:12:20 UTC-0400 (Thu, 11 Jul 2024 06:12:20 +0800)
Jeff Pang via mailop
is rumored to have said:
This is what claude-3.5-sonnet answered for att email domains.
It is a grossly unwise choice to look to ANY LLM for factual answers and
it is actively misleading to present what
* Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop:
> The .eu.org free domains have been there since many years and from
> what I know, are rarely abused. But I guess some people immediately
> stop thinking when they hear about "free domains"...
Personally, I don't factor the price of domains into the block/pass
decisio
On 2024-07-11 18:38, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
The .eu.org free domains have been there since many years and from what
I
know, are rarely abused. But I guess some people immediately stop
thinking
when they hear about "free domains"...
maybe you could get a rafaeu.org instead. org dom
Dnia 10.07.2024 o godz. 21:24:23 Ralph Seichter via mailop pisze:
>
> If sombody tries to send mail from something.xxx or otherthing.auto, for
> example, they should expect having to work hard for their mail getting
> accepted. I reject this type of domain until by means of directing
I don't know
Ahoj,
Dňa Thu, 11 Jul 2024 08:37:05 +0200 Benoît Panizzon via mailop
napísal:
> The sender domain usually just got registered before the emails are
> sent and is being deleted shortly after.
did you try to identify new domains with zrd.dq.spamhaus.net,
fresh.fmb.la or fresh*.spameatingmonkey.ne
38 matches
Mail list logo
