Did anyone had any success connecting to 'Tiscali' postmaster?
From: mailop On Behalf Of Duncan Brannen via mailop
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 7:08 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [mailop] Tiscali / Talktalk Content deferred (TT991)
Afternoon,
Any Talktalk / Tisc
I've never understood why people post for help but withhold information.
They seem to be afraid to reveal the affected IP. Why? Afraid we'll all
run to block it?
Given the IP, others can tell you what we are seeing from that IP and
possibly what is causing listings with different BLs.
I don'
On Mar 22, 2024, at 10:58 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
wrote:
> the result code and the spamhaus search didn't provide any relevant info.
Hmmm. Not relevant to you, perhaps, but it may be relevant to someone else who
can help. I can't imagine how anyone could begin helping you without
If they are 'dedicated', doesn't matter if they are coming from
SendGrid, the PTR should reflect your clients domain.
host 149.72.234.90
90.234.72.149.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
wrqvzxrx.outbound-mail.sendgrid.net.
And given the amount of abuse of SendGrid servers, anything you can do
Hello postmasters,
One of our clients has been sending a debt collection campaign using email as
the last resort of communication. These emails are more transactional and use a
campaign mailing system to give some analytics.
Context:
We have 2 standard emails that go our daily. These emails des
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 18:40:16 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via mailop
wrote:
Are there any other checks or measures I can do?
On 21.03.24 13:58, Michael Rathbun via mailop wrote:
What exactly is the Zen result code? There are many reasons for such
listings.
the result code and the spamhau
On Fri 22/Mar/2024 18:04:44 +0100 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Alessandro Vesely via mailop said:
IME, my heuristic algorithm fails more often because senders "oversign", by
signing technical such as Content-Type: or Content-Transfer-Encoding: than
because it meets an unknown transformat
It appears that Alessandro Vesely via mailop said:
>IME, my heuristic algorithm fails more often because senders "oversign", by
>signing technical such as Content-Type: or Content-Transfer-Encoding: than
>because it meets an unknown transformation, albeit I only see a limited number
>of mailing
On Thu 21/Mar/2024 23:38:22 +0100 Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Depending on the kind of changes which have been applied to the
message you can reverse the transformations and verify the original
DKIM signatures. A member of this list developed
On Thu 21/Mar/2024 15:23:59 +0100 Dave Crocker via mailop wrote:
On 3/21/2024 3:47 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
Mailing lists modify messages in a de-facto standard way.
actually, they don't. or rather, there is more than one de-facto set of
modifications and therefore efforts to reverse the
10 matches
Mail list logo
