On 2023-11-18 01:58:36 (+0800), Jarland Donnell via mailop wrote:
I "feel" like there's been an increase but I'm not sure if the numbers
support my gut feeling. Here's some stats I just pulled if you want to
look at them:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14RfO9_RBnQBu4i2lzP4zYMGaQfTDGtNLm
We've been having delivery issues to gmail since November 15 at 12:17 pm
(Central). But there's still lots of email going through, too.
Here's an example from our mail server's logs:
Failed rr=Site gmail.com (2607:f8b0:4001:c5a::1a) said after data sent:
550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/
On Fri, 2023-11-17 at 23:33 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> Dnia 17.11.2023 o godz. 14:34:19 Lukas Tribus via mailop pisze:
> >
> > Google probably wants you to enable STARTTLS, so reducing sending
> > limits for non STARTTLS senders can make sense from Google's POV.
>
> That thread make
Dnia 17.11.2023 o godz. 22:37:58 Philip Paeps via mailop pisze:
> For the past couple of days, mx2.FreeBSD.org is queuing more mail to
> Google than usual.
>
> This is the 421:
>
> 421-4.7.28 Gmail has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail.
> To protect 421-4.7.28 our users from spam, mail
Dnia 17.11.2023 o godz. 14:34:19 Lukas Tribus via mailop pisze:
>
> Google probably wants you to enable STARTTLS, so reducing sending
> limits for non STARTTLS senders can make sense from Google's POV.
That thread makes me wonder, how come anybody is sending mail without
STARTTLS now? When all ma
I "feel" like there's been an increase but I'm not sure if the numbers
support my gut feeling. Here's some stats I just pulled if you want to
look at them:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14RfO9_RBnQBu4i2lzP4zYMGaQfTDGtNLmcC_E0xQeP4/edit?usp=sharing
On 2023-11-17 08:37, Philip Paeps via
On 11/17/2023 8:21, Seth Charles via mailop wrote:
Wondering if anyone here has had any recent success actually talking
to them - outside of hiding behind their HQ sign and throwing pebbles
at their CEO's window.
Probably not. They suck. We block optonline users from signing up and
tell them
And Laura,
This is ONLY the tip of the iceberg.. as long as businesses find they
can get away with things, they will keep pushing the boundaries..
Whether it is Digital Ocean turning a blind eye, or even facilitating
criminal activity, encouraging other hosters to do the same, or putting
up
Your hypothesis is accurate; speaking from professional experience with
Proofpoint products, there is an option within the Proofpoint PoD DKIM
signing configuration to set the Domain scope to "Any" which will
reproduce this behavior if someone just left the defaults when
generating a key(s).
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 4:53 AM Gellner, Oliver via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> This reminds of the joke how a computer programmer would hunt a lion in
> Africa:
> 1. Go to the northernmost place
> 2. Traverse the continent alternately east and west working southwards
> 3. Catch every a
For the past couple of days, mx2.FreeBSD.org is queuing more mail to
Google than usual.
This is the 421:
421-4.7.28 Gmail has detected an unusual rate of unsolicited mail. To
protect 421-4.7.28 our users from spam, mail has been temporarily rate
limited. Please 421-4.7.28 visit 421-4.7.28
h
It could even be as simple as the use of TLS being a datapoint for their
filters, and the change in that datapoint was enough to either improve a score
or modify a fingerprint enough to change the bucket the messages are classified
in.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: mailop On Behalf Of
Hi,
Two things can be true at the same time.
The OP did not say that you will never have deferrals once you turn on STARTTLS.
He said that he had deferrals without STARTTLS that went away with STARTTLS.
It is definitely possible that STARTTLS influences behaviours and
limits, just as IPv4 vs I
On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 10:00, Jeroen via mailop wrote:
>
> > We use an MTA which supports STARTTLS, sending the message data
> > through an encrypted channel for servers which support it (like
> > Google).
>
> Thank you for enabling opportunistic STARTTLS - you've stepped up the
> game for both yo
Hey there, secret society-
I'm scrambling in the dark a little bit trying to get a hold of
Opimum because of some txl mail being blocked. I know,
it'snotconsistentlyreliable..
I've gone down various DNS rabbit holes, mined Slack, mailed through a
gamut of abuse@ and postmaster@ al
On 16 Nov 2023, at 19:57, Jay Hennigan via mailop wrote:
>
> On 11/16/23 02:54, Laura Atkins via mailop wrote:
>> The New York Times
>> Laura
>
> Can you be more specific? Link to an article?
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=cloudflare+doxx
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=cloudflare+new+york+time
We use an MTA which supports STARTTLS, sending the message data
through an encrypted channel for servers which support it (like
Google).
Thank you for enabling opportunistic STARTTLS - you've stepped up the
game for both yourself and possible clients. However, it is not
something that will mit
17 matches
Mail list logo
