John Levine via mailop skrev den 2023-06-03 00:34:
If you mean the DKIM record, which one? It has quite a few.
Authentication-Results mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit
key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com
header.b="paysHkcv"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) r
Apologies, typo correction - *"/MX address record limitation as *10 *A
lookups/ /instead of 1/"
On 6/2/2023 5:45 PM, Mark Alley wrote:
You'll find that several validators are somewhat liberal with
interpretation of RFC logic and the ABNFs. So, it's not really too
surprising.
For example, M
You'll find that several validators are somewhat liberal with
interpretation of RFC logic and the ABNFs. So, it's not really too
surprising.
For example, MXToolbox's SPF validator (until very recently, it seems
they have since fixed it) used to count the number of IP addresses
resolved from t
It appears that Gellner, Oliver via mailop said:
>
>The DKIM record of John Levines domain is reported as invalid too, while you
>should think that he knows his way around DKIM. So in the end this Google tool
>might in fact be buggy.
If you mean the DMARC record for johnlevine.com, it's valid,
> On 02.06.2023 at 10:22 Johan Lavsund via mailop wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Can you try adding a ; to the end of the dns record?
> On 02.06.2023 at 10:23 Taavi Eomäe via mailop wrote:
>
> Your DKIM TXT record seems valid, but does not specify the key type, looking
> at the length it should prob
On Fri 02/Jun/2023 02:14:50 +0200 Brandon Long via mailop wrote:
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 11:20 AM Alessandro Vesely via mailop.org wrote:
On Thu 01/Jun/2023 17:45:38 +0200 Robert L Mathews wrote:
So I guess it's time to add SRS rewriting for Gmail addresses...!
The only points I see in SRS ar
Dňa 2. júna 2023 10:32:02 UTC používateľ Benny Pedersen via mailop
napísal:
>this is only needed if defaults is not ok, so it follows what is with dmarc
>where all is optional
Are you sure? AFAIK the v= and p= are required by
RFC 7489, sect. 6.3. With exception for p= in case
of rua= only reco
> this is only needed if defaults is not ok, so it follows what is with
dmarc where all is optional
According to the standard, yes, judging by at least this one tool
complaining, ehh...
I think applying the robustness principle of being conservative in what
you do and being liberal in what y
Taavi Eomäe via mailop skrev den 2023-06-02 10:23:
Your DKIM TXT record seems valid, but does not specify the key type,
looking at the length it should probably contain "k=rsa". Or they
might not like you specifying acceptable hash algorithms.
this is only needed if defaults is not ok, so it fo
Gellner, Oliver via mailop skrev den 2023-06-02 09:45:
Hello,
the Google admin toolbox claims our DKIM keys and MTA-STS entries are
invalid. Example:
https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/checkmx/check?domain=dm.de&dkim_selector=dmglobal4
reports "Invalid format of DKIM record"
what errors
http
Your DKIM TXT record seems valid, but does not specify the key type,
looking at the length it should probably contain "k=rsa". Or they might
not like you specifying acceptable hash algorithms.
Your mta-sts.txt does not have a trailing newline, I'm not sure if the
standard mandates it, but that
Hi Oliver,
Can you try adding a ; to the end of the dns record?
Like: v=STSv1; id=202203071353;
Kind Regards
Johan
On 2023-06-02 09:45, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Hello,
the Google admin toolbox claims our DKIM keys and MTA-STS entries are invalid. Example:
https://toolbox.googleap
Hi Oliver,
It fails for the DKIM setup on all my domains too, but MTA-STS checks
out ok. I looked at your MTA-STS dns record and policy file and can´t
see anything wrong.
Kind Regards
Johan
On 2023-06-02 09:45, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote:
Hello,
the Google admin toolbox claims our D
Hello,
the Google admin toolbox claims our DKIM keys and MTA-STS entries are invalid.
Example:
https://toolbox.googleapps.com/apps/checkmx/check?domain=dm.de&dkim_selector=dmglobal4
reports "Invalid format of DKIM record" and "MTA STS is malformed". I cannot
find out what is invalid about them
14 matches
Mail list logo
