On 9/3/22 15:43, Radek Kaczynski via mailop wrote:
Good evening,
[snip]
I personally am not a fan of cold email, and sometimes do get irritated
by the spammy one.
But I also see it sometimes as an equalizer - giving the same chances
when competing with global enterprises.
[snip]
But RE
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> A former client was trying to setup Fedora 36 sendmail with dane
> validation. F36 comes with sendmail 8.17.1 which is supposed to support
> dane, but they get verify=fail talking to my mail servers. So I googled
If would have been nice if y
I think it's fair to say that there is "some" room for nuance on cold
email, but the reason I don't allow it on my platform and I actively
work to block companies that do, is simply this:
There is absolutely no one out there looking for help to send a cold
email that isn't sending spam.
I me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 00:43 +0200, Radek Kaczynski via mailop wrote:
> If any of you would like to get a full list of our IP addresses and
> domains so that you can block Bouncer's requests - please feel free to
> email me at ra...@usebouncer.com.
P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2022-09-03 at 17:41 +, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote:
> How did you notice that "something is now broken"?
A former client was trying to setup Fedora 36 sendmail with dane
validation. F36 comes with sendmail 8.17.1 which is supposed to s
Good evening,
I feel like I need to come clean on the Bouncer - Woodpecker association and my
perspective on cold email.
(But please let me know if my responses are not welcome - I feel here like a
guest, and I don’t want to abuse your hospitality)
Long story short - when working for Mack Truc
How did you notice that "something is now broken"?
"works for me" - I just tried it with an MTA that supports DANE:
server=172.102.240.42,
starttls=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, verify=DANE_SEC,
cert_subject=/CN=mail3.five-ten-sg.com,
cert_issuer=/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=R3,
pubkey_fp
Can anyone here point me to a contact for dealing with a problem regarding
Cloudmark CSI.
I tried their website for support but they have not replied.
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Dňa 3. septembra 2022 9:17:41 UTC používateľ Simon Arlott via mailop
napísal:
>Looks like the latest version of this (https://github.com/shuque/gotls)
>returns the reason why it fails, which appears to be a bug in the tool
>caused by the expired DST X3 CA:
>
>Result: FAILED: DANE TLS error: cer
On 02/09/2022 16:16, Carl Byington via mailop wrote:
> Years ago I setup automation for tlsa records to support smtp dane here.
> However, something is now broken, and I am not sure what is wrong.
>
> _25._tcp.mail3.five-ten-sg.com. IN TLSA 3 0 1 (
> 834d710b2feb790cc9b2c6d251c65b1fedc24c51a4149
10 matches
Mail list logo
