It was purely observational, I thought others had already noticed it. It
consumed a lot of support time on our side. Maybe I'll try to pull the
data to get a better idea of how it looked by the numbers.
On 2022-08-27 22:28, Darrell Budic via mailop wrote:
Was there any published notification a
Was there any published notification about this? Not that there’s a good place
for it, but between mailop and nanog, I’d have thought I’d have seen it…
At any rate, this error message seems like it would be better as “Gmail now
requires senders to have SPF and/or DKIM enabled to send mail to Gma
It was just added about the time I was sending that email, so it wasn’t there
when my customer got the bounces. I imagine you are seeing caching and it
should be solid soon.
> On Aug 27, 2022, at 6:04 PM, Ángel via mailop wrote:
>
> On 2022-08-27 at 17:09 -0500, Darrell Budic wrote:
>> Anyone
Also ensure their passwords are all unique, this sounds like a password reuse
hack. Also, does their cell number still make and receive calls and texts, and
have you checked with
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022, Chris Woods wrote:
Chances are the SMS was the first thing changed to prevent you regaining a
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022, 00:25 Dave Lugo via mailop, wrote:
> My fiance's FB account was hijacked by a bad actor today. The bad actor
> changed the email address on the account, and despite multiple attempts to
> recover the account using SMS, the SMS texts don't arrive (dunno if
> her carrier veri
My fiance's FB account was hijacked by a bad actor today. The bad actor
changed the email address on the account, and despite multiple attempts to
recover the account using SMS, the SMS texts don't arrive (dunno if
her carrier verizon is having SMS issues or not)
Can anyone from FB please, pl
On 2022-08-27 at 17:09 -0500, Darrell Budic wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this? Customer of mine just got some bounces from
> gmail for invalid SPF/DKIM. He doesn’t have either, so I’m not sure
> what this is about?
>
> Mind you, I did send him to setup a valid SPF entry, and
> authentication is goo
Google has recent started requiring SPF. I don't know if they require it
100% of the time but they do now reject emails from domains that either
don't have it, or have it improperly configured, and they won't accept
it from those domains until it's fixed. It has helped me a good bit,
making it
Anyone else seeing this? Customer of mine just got some bounces from gmail for
invalid SPF/DKIM. He doesn’t have either, so I’m not sure what this is about?
Mind you, I did send him to setup a valid SPF entry, and authentication is
good, but this seems like a misleading error message...
>
>
Hello John,
> If it's opt-in, please identify all of the IPs that send mail or DNS or web
> queries so those of us who have not opted in can block them.
I just started going through the setup built at VT and found several points
where there will have to be some serious re-design of several compon
Hello Bill,
> I refuse to participate in your research, as all evidence I have is that VT
> is grossly unethical and allows incompetents to run research projects.
I hear your frustration with this, and will not defend the measurements that
took place in February. As outlined below, we will work o
It appears that Tobias Fiebig via mailop said:
>Heho,
>Thank you all for your feedback, and especially to Simon for pointing out the
>issue in February. This should, of
>course, not happen, and is part of the reason why we are moving this to strict
>opt-in measurements.
If it's opt-in, please
On 2022-08-27 at 14:07:50 UTC-0400 (Sat, 27 Aug 2022 20:07:50 +0200)
Tobias Fiebig via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Heho,
Thank you all for your feedback, and especially to Simon for pointing
out the issue in February. This should, of course, not happen, and is
part of the reason why we ar
Heho,
Thank you all for your feedback, and especially to Simon for pointing out the
issue in February. This should, of course, not happen, and is part of the
reason why we are moving this to strict opt-in measurements. I discussed your
points with the project lead (Taejoong “tijay” Chung ), who
On 25/08/2022 11:39, Tobias Fiebig via mailop wrote:
> An attacker may use an infinite number of SPF referrals in their SPF setting
> and can send an email to a vulnerable mail server which would make the SMTP
> server make a whole lot of DNS queries. By exploiting this vulnerability, an
> attac
15 matches
Mail list logo
