On 2022-03-21 at 15:28:28 UTC-0400 (Mon, 21 Mar 2022 20:28:28 +0100)
Sebastian Nielsen via mailop
is rumored to have said:
Im talking about matching MAIL FROM (which is hidden from user, but
authenticated via SPF/DKIM)
DKIM does not authenticate the MAIL FROM (envelope sender) address. It
pr
On 2022-03-21 at 14:43:46 UTC-0400 (Mon, 21 Mar 2022 19:43:46 +0100)
Sebastian Nielsen via mailop
is rumored to have said:
The best solution I would propose, is that Email should slowly
transitition to a requirement that the address inside "MAIL FROM:" and
"From:" header in mime data, *must* e
Pretty convincing??? To whom ?
I cannot be the only one who is instantly de-convinced by English text
that was clearly not written by a native English speaker.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently A
To discuss? No.
Recipient needs to open a bug with Customer Support.
But please keep in mind that voicemail to email gateways are a common
smokescreen for phish and malware.
It's become somewhat of a nuisance.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spa
Is Michael or anyone else on the list from Microsoft available to discuss a
delivery issue we are having to Microsoft hosted domains? The short, short
version is that users on Microsoft/Outlook/O365 services are not getting legit
messages from Voicemail-to-Email mail flows. The messages are ac
>>Seriously? Using Hotmail/Google is NOT FREE..
It is. They earn the money on ads, but the ad cost cannot swallow a fine. That
would mean they would need some way to reimburse the fine from the end user,
meaning you would need to have a credit rating as it would count as a loan
agreement, requ
On 2022-03-21 11:43, Sebastian Nielsen via mailop wrote:
But if Microsoft got fined for every phishing email that escaped
This would QUICKLY kill every free email service, and every email service would
become pay-only, to cope with the fines. Propably with obligation-to-pay
contracts too, s
>> But if Microsoft got fined for every phishing email that escaped
This would QUICKLY kill every free email service, and every email service would
become pay-only, to cope with the fines. Propably with obligation-to-pay
contracts too, so they can forward the fine down to the user that sent the
Is this another one of those "research" things where someone does evil
and then claims to have good motives? That website renam.md kind of
seems like it.
On 2022-03-21 11:57, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
Authenticated from FastHosts..
Source:
Received: from mail.renam.md (HELO mail.re
Of course its important to check WHO is sending the email too, not just that
its signed.
The email is obviously not from ICANN. Of course it authenticates correctly as
the sender it claims to be, as that’s the truth.
Authentication – checking that something is true and not false.
For exampl
A Russian government agency tasked with implementing the block could run a 5xx
responder on port 25 if it had the IPs directed at it.
On 10 March 2022 21:15:43 UTC, Jay Hennigan via mailop
wrote:
>On 3/10/22 12:22, Autumn Tyr-Salvia via mailop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Given world events at the m
I said years ago, when these policies came out (WDRP and then WAP) that
they would accomplish nothing other than to provide a gift-wrapped
phishing mechanism.
- mark
On 2022-03-21 12:57 PM, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> Authenticated from FastHosts..
>
> Source:
>
> Received: from mail.re
Authenticated from FastHosts..
Source:
Received: from mail.renam.md (HELO mail.renam.md) (81.180.84.189)
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 07:35:59AM +0100, Hans-Martin Mosner via mailop wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> in a trustworthy Received: line of a spam I found the source IP
> 81.70.92.213. Strangely, this IP is pingable, and traceroute finds a
> way, but neither the IP whois nor the BGP looking glass show to wh
14 matches
Mail list logo
