> On Oct 18, 2021, at 1:02 PM, Atro Tossavainen via mailop
> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 01:04:53PM -0700, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via mailop
> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> For years now I've been the target of a number of resumes from
>> UAE-based google-groups.
>
> Have a look at these two thi
On 10/18/2021 12:35 PM, Brandon Long wrote:
Anyways, I stand by that there is unlikely to be overlap between people
blocking your
smtp server and your customers accessing your imap server...
yup. and that's why I asked for a detailed explanation from anyone
claiming a linkage. Haven't see
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 01:04:53PM -0700, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) via mailop wrote:
> All,
>
> For years now I've been the target of a number of resumes from
> UAE-based google-groups.
Have a look at these two things.
https://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/spammer/SPM1559/syedsmarketing
https://www.sp
There is no deliberate connection between the authentication method and
automatic-bcc... but bugs make fools of us all.
Are all of your tests using the same user? If you can send me details
off-list, I can investigate further.
Brandon
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:58 PM Kostya Vasilyev via mailop
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:22 AM Dave Crocker via mailop
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/18/2021 10:56 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dave Crocker via mailop
> > mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/2021 5:40 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> >
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dave Crocker via mailop
wrote:
>
>
> On 10/15/2021 5:40 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> > The motivation for spreading service IPs across different /24 prefixes
> > is so that if
>
> The issue here is not the generic one of using multiple IPs. It is
> about u
On 10/18/2021 10:56 AM, Brandon Long wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dave Crocker via mailop
mailto:mailop@mailop.org>> wrote:
On 10/15/2021 5:40 PM, Grant Taylor via mailop wrote:
> The motivation for spreading service IPs across different /24
prefixes
> is so t
GPT is back but data is still backfilling for some folks (including me).
I'm a tiny sender, so I assume I'm way down their priority list.
Cheers,
Al Iverson
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 7:04 AM Yitzhak Cohen via mailop
wrote:
> Can back partially last week, sometime on Friday I think. When I looked
Thank you for the info Ewald.
Could you or anyone else please confirm when you got the reports for the
missing week ?
Much appreciated,
Toni
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:33 AM Ewald Kessler | Tripolis via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Data is back. And backfilled!
>
>
>
> *From:* mailop *O
Hi Leandro,
with a load balancer (we are using Keepalived) you can provide to your
customers both configurations:
- one IP for POP/IMAP/SMTP (es. mail.DOMAIN)
- two dedicated IP one for downloaded messages (POP/IMAP) and one for
sending messages (SMTP)
If you have a small setup POP/IMAP/SM
Can back partially last week, sometime on Friday I think. When I looked again
today it was fully back-filled.
From: mailop on behalf of Ewald Kessler | Tripolis
via mailop
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2021 13:19
To: Antonie Popovic
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subj
Must have been between Friday afternoon (CET) and this morning.
From: Antonie Popovic
Sent: Monday, 18 October 2021 12:17
To: Ewald Kessler | Tripolis
Cc: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools - No data since October 4th
Thank you for the info Ewald.
Could you or anyon
Data is back. And backfilled!
From: mailop On Behalf Of Danny Steinhoff via mailop
Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2021 09:35
To: Maarten Oelering
Cc: mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools - No data since October 4th
We do not get any data since 4 October
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:
13 matches
Mail list logo
