Al - thanks so much for the details. We are just seeing on hard bounces and
likely just Microsoft. It came up when we were trying to analyze hard bounces
from COI (confirmed opt in) mailings to a new user at Microsoft. We are COI
for all domains but noticed the asynchronous issue at Microsof
The common industry term for what you're referring to is "asynchronous
bounce" (google it -- it'd help provide more background) and these are
actually somewhat uncommon nowadays, as they contribute to a
spam/annoyance problem called "backscatter" where somebody other than
the sender gets unwanted m
Our tech team has been trying to look more closely into how Microsoft handles
bounces. We are Return Path/Validity Sender Score Certified and have no known
issues. We are a content creator in the arts and crafts and recipe niche
content categories. In looking at an internal write-up it looks lik
Hi guys,
Sorry to break it to you, but the bad news about the pct tag is that not
everyone respects it. No matter what percentage you have some providers
will just apply your policy to the entire email traffic.
Have a great weekend,
Toni
On Sat, 21 Aug 2021, 19:38 A. Schulze via mailop wrote:
It appears that A. Schulze via mailop said:
>Am 20.08.2021 um 04:48 schrieb John Levine via mailop:
>>> It's mostly to assuage the fears of large senders that all their mail will
>>> be trashed if they've set up something wrong, ime. They can set it to 20%
>>> and observe the consequences "just t
Am 20.08.2021 um 04:48 schrieb John Levine via mailop:
It's mostly to assuage the fears of large senders that all their mail will
be trashed if they've set up something wrong, ime. They can set it to 20%
and observe the consequences "just to be sure" before going to 100%.
That was the plan. D
