Tim Bray via mailop writes:
> apt install unbound
>
> It comes configured fairly safely, listening only on localhost.
>
> and edit /etc/resolv.conf to say
>
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
> And there isn't much else to it for single machine. Indeed it is
> quite a good way to bring DNSSEC up to the lo
Hey, I'd like to second this! Lili Crowley at Verizon is a great person and
very helpful when it comes to helping us great unwashed masses resolve
email delivery issues. It doesn't hurt that she is super smart and very
insightful as well. Verizon is chock full of good people here. Not all
large B2C
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:29 PM Tim Bray via mailop wrote:
>
> On 16/07/2021 17:58, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
> > If you want to guide this dummy on how to run a local resolver like
> > that, I'd appreciate the tips.:) I was trying to get out of the DNS
> > business but if I want to do any loc
On 16/07/2021 17:58, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
If you want to guide this dummy on how to run a local resolver like
that, I'd appreciate the tips.:) I was trying to get out of the DNS
business but if I want to do any local DNSBL querying, I guess I have
to reconsider that.
On an debian/ubunt
This has been a great mailing list to be a part of, most posts are people
seeking to resolve issues.
I thought I would post a massive thank you to Lili Crowley and the team at
Verizon helping to resolve a problem we were having, it's such a refreshing
change to be able to speak with people and not
On Thu, 15 Jul 2021, Bastian Blank wrote:
Did you check the result of those RBL requests? Spamhaus also provides
specific codes for errors, so you _must_ explicitely list what codes you
want to accept. See
https://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/DNSBL%20Usage#200 what those mean.
I've been cons
Just make it simple, set your DNS servers to be your upstream provider..
You pay them money, use their services if you don't want to run your own
DNS server..
PS, don't even THINK of using DoH ;)
BTW, everyone keeps talking about 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8, but consider that..
'https://download.dnsc
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Al Iverson wrote:
is it bad vibes to query Spamhaus directly against
a.gns.spamhaus.org - e.gns.spamhaus.org?
Those are the servers that would normally be queried, in that they are
the listed NS for the DBL, PBL, SBL, XBL, SBL-XBL and ZEN zones.
/mark
_
On 7/16/21 10:58 AM, Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
Each resolver node is set up of multiple pools that consist of resolvers
I run, my provider, and 8.8.8.8/1.1.1.1.
If you want to guide this dummy on how to run a local resolver like
that, I'd appreciate the tips. :) I was trying to get out of t
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 3:52 PM Brielle via mailop wrote:
>
> On 7/15/21 12:26 PM, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> > It appears that Tim Bray via mailop said:
> >> Just check which DNS servers you are using. And lot of the 8.8.8.8
> >> and 9.9.9.9 of the world and similar don't work very well
What's the error message? Some 4xx version of this? 5.7.1 (delivery
not authorized) [999.999.999.999 7] Our system has detected that this
message is likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of spam sent
to Gmail, this message has been blocked. Please visit
https://support.google.com/mail/?p=Un
On 7/16/21 09:09, Eric Tykwinski via mailop wrote:
Just a heads up, I noticed some emails piling up in our spool.
Common part is McAfee’s ad in the signature.
“
Scanned by McAfee and confirmed virus-free. Find
out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO
“
In addition to Google marking as spam, wh
Oh, good point about them not being bulk. I'm stuck in that ESP mindset, sorry!
Dealing with similar stuff 'round these parts, though.
Google clearly ratcheted up the filtering lately.
I feel like maybe somebody also needs to tell McAfee to ditch that
signature! I wonder if it is centralized and c
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:09:10PM -0400, Eric Tykwinski via mailop wrote:
> Just a heads up, I noticed some emails piling up in our spool.
> Common part is McAfee's ad in the signature.
This was already reported. Kill the ads with fire, Google is (IMHO
correctly) considering them spam.
Bastian
Al,
Not bulk emails at all, just normal back and forth from our users.
Here's the response from my test:
[2021.07.16] 12:05:59.622 [51075407] RSP: 421-4.7.0 [66.252.96.10 15] Our
system has detected that this message is
[2021.07.16] 12:05:59.622 [51075407] RSP: 421-4.7.0 suspicious due to t
On 7/16/21 09:09, Eric Tykwinski via mailop wrote:
Just a heads up, I noticed some emails piling up in our spool.
Common part is McAfee’s ad in the signature.
Scanned by McAfee and confirmed virus-free. Find
out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO
Previous thread suggests that they're being agg
Just a heads up, I noticed some emails piling up in our spool.
Common part is McAfee's ad in the signature.
"
Scanned by McAfee and confirmed virus-free. Find
out more here: https://bit.ly/2zCJMrO
"
Sincerely,
Eric Tykwinski
TrueNet, Inc.
P: 610-429-8300
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
