On 07/07/2020 15:11, Andrew C Aitchison via mailop wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
>
> On 07/07/2020 01:01, Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
>
> I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
> problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presenta
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020, Noel Butler via mailop wrote:
On 07/07/2020 01:01, Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presentation on how
they statistically identify users by their DNS traffic,
Executive summary:
DoH is intended to reset the balance of control and data collection
from ISPs, system and network administrators towards (browser) users.
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
One thing not mentioned so far in this thread, is data collection..
While many D
On 07/07/2020 01:49, John Levine via mailop wrote:
> In article <20200706150152.ga9...@tron.kom.tuwien.ac.at>,
>
>> I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
>> problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presentation on how
>> they statistically identify users by th
On 07/07/2020 01:01, Johann Klasek via mailop wrote:
> I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
> problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presentation on how
> they statistically identify users by their DNS traffic, and could create
> a profile with interests and
Hi,
There are no breaches or spam or anything sent from that server. I
would know as I am part of the AS6772 Abuse Desk. :-) Just the
dozed or so emails per day sent by my family members and myself.
Even emails to my own Gmail Account where my sending email address for
sure is a know past send
On 2020-07-06 06:39, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
Dnia 5.07.2020 o godz. 14:13:03 Chris via mailop pisze:
Not to mention DNS over HTTPS breaks or renders ineffective most
types of content filtering.
That's a secondary concern perhaps. I'm betting 99% of users don't
have content filtering
In article <20200706150152.ga9...@tron.kom.tuwien.ac.at>,
>I have been told that DoH is set into place to solve the privacy
>problem. On a small DNS workgroup meeting I saw a presentation on how
>they statistically identify users by their DNS traffic, and could create
>a profile with interests and
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 07:10:11AM -0700, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
> One thing not mentioned so far in this thread, is data collection..
>
> While many D'oh providers claim NOT to log or track, simply by using
> HTTPS opens up the door to exposing personal browsing habits..
>
> It is v
One thing not mentioned so far in this thread, is data collection..
While many D'oh providers claim NOT to log or track, simply by using
HTTPS opens up the door to exposing personal browsing habits..
It is very easy to simply 'extend' any HTTPS request, to include other
information in the req
On 7/6/20 4:00 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> But is content filtering - especially in corporations - really based on DNS?
Yes. There's a big company, Cisco (you may have heard of them) which
bought OpenDNS and which is aggressively pushing their DNS-based
filtering service (called Umbrella) as p
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:48 AM Vittorio Bertola via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
>
> The bad idea is taking an extremely marginal use case ("there is a
> dissident in a third world country whose government is blocking access to
> Wikipedia via DNS and we want to circumvent that block") and u
Hello Jaroslaw,
On 06.07.20 12:39, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> But is content filtering - especially in corporations - really based on DNS?
yes. That's why systems like https://pi-hole.net/ exist, even for home
users.
In Germany ISPs were even forced by lawmakers to block specific DNS
host
Dnia 5.07.2020 o godz. 14:13:03 Chris via mailop pisze:
> >>Not to mention DNS over HTTPS breaks or renders ineffective most
> >>types of content filtering.
>
> >That's a secondary concern perhaps. I'm betting 99% of users don't
> >have content filtering and don't want it.
>
> Corporates need it
> Il 06/07/2020 09:41 Andrew C Aitchison via mailop ha
> scritto:
>
> I have mixed feelings about Mozilla defaulting the world (or the USA) to DoH
> (technically I don't like it, but I sympathize with the philosophical
> idea) but that doesn't explain why DoH itself is a bad idea.
DoH is not
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020, Chris Lewis via mailop wrote:
On 2020-07-05 15:19, Jay R. Ashworth via mailop wrote:
An argument I could tolerate -- corporate IT types can be expected to
diagnose
smartly enough to deal with it... though it will still make things more
difficult for them.
Impossible for
16 matches
Mail list logo
