Re: [mailop] RoadRunner Help?

Can you send me ips and the last time you got that? > On Feb 14, 2018, at 1:25 PM, Al Iverson wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Michael Peddemors > wrote: >> Yes, stop using obfuscated MAIL FROM's > > It's not really wise to use non-obfuscated return paths when using > VERP. If it'

Re: [mailop] RoadRunner Help?

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Michael Peddemors wrote: > Yes, stop using obfuscated MAIL FROM's It's not really wise to use non-obfuscated return paths when using VERP. If it's easily decodable, a goofball could spin up fake ones to try to get 'em logged as legitimate bounces and inhibit futu

mailop@mailop.org

In article <9bd624ba-acfd-7bb0-def0-87b89165a...@keycodes.com> you write: >> Spamhaus lists that IP as a "courtesy SBL listing" -- presumably at the >> request of the IP's owner. Here are other IPs Spamhaus lists as a courtesy: >> >> https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/courtesy.spamhaus.org > >

Re: [mailop] RoadRunner Help?

Yes, stop using obfuscated MAIL FROM's On 18-02-14 11:48 AM, Brett Schenker wrote: Not sure if anyone from RoadRunner is on here or can help. We have a client that's receiving the below in bounces but the IPs aren't blocked by Road Runner and doing some research on the web it seems like a t

Re: [mailop] RoadRunner Help?

Hi Brett, Information on those errors was posted by Ira Hawkins back in October. Even though they are 5xx-level errors it seems they should be treated as a possible grey-listing. TWC just implemented new Cloudmark MTAs over the last 2 months that are now generating those AUP# rate limit errors

[mailop] RoadRunner Help?

Not sure if anyone from RoadRunner is on here or can help. We have a client that's receiving the below in bounces but the IPs aren't blocked by Road Runner and doing some research on the web it seems like a technical set up issue possibly? Anyone have suggestions/advice? 550 5.1.0 sender rejected

Re: [mailop] Mail Transfer Agent Alternatives

* Emre Üst |euro.message| : > We are using Powermta(Port25) but their support service fee is rediciously > high . We are looking for new mta . Could anyone recommend to Port25 > altenatives ? > > What are you thinking about GreenArrow - drh.net ? I don't know if it fits your requirements, but yo

mailop@mailop.org

Jay, I'm not speaking for Spamhaus or 1&1 here, but some hosting providers do outbound spam detection, and treat outbound mail that they believe is spammy in a different way than their customers' less suspicious outbound mail. In 1&1's case, it appears that they route the suspicious outbound mail v

mailop@mailop.org

On 2/14/18 9:47 AM, Paul Kincaid-Smith wrote: Hi Scott, Spamhaus lists that IP as a "courtesy SBL listing" -- presumably at the request of the IP's owner. Here are other IPs Spamhaus lists as a courtesy: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/courtesy.spamhaus.org So how exactly does that wo

mailop@mailop.org

Hi Scott, Spamhaus lists that IP as a "courtesy SBL listing" -- presumably at the request of the IP's owner. Here are other IPs Spamhaus lists as a courtesy: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/courtesy.spamhaus.org Paul Kincaid-Smith EmailGrades On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 7:16 AM, Scott Underco

mailop@mailop.org

On 14 Feb 2018, at 6:00 (-0500), Stefan Haunß wrote: of course http://postmaster.1and1.com is public and if you read the following section carefully "IP Addresses for 1&1 Mail Servers" one might come to the conclusion that there is no problem... Which would be incorrect, because the listed add

Re: [mailop] Yahoo Support Page

On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 13:30:25 +0100, David Hofstee said: > As much as I like to complain, I am not sure I would come to the same > conclusion. It seems like a simple bug. > >> *Don't do that*. Just paste the headers and maybe the text version. > >> Because the form is not POST-ed but GET-ed. This

[mailop] Contacts of escout / ispn.net

Hello Maybe somebody has actual contacts of escout / ispn.net ? We have a lot of outloops like 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [ x.x.x.x ] blocked using foreign.rbl.e-scout.net; Host x.x.x.x (UA3) suspicious. Please forward this message to serv...@ispn.net for resolution. But nobody

mailop@mailop.org

Official note I got from 1and1 Abuse Technican a few months ago: Be aware that all mails that we forward on customer request and that are recognized as spam will be relayed via a host with rDNS mout-xforward.. Your sample IP is such a relay, so you may feel free to block emails from those relay

mailop@mailop.org

Am 14.02.2018 um 15:16 schrieb Scott Undercofler: https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/82.165.159.133 Please have a look at Forwarding with a spam evaluation entered in th

mailop@mailop.org

https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/82.165.159.133 That’s what I get sending from their outbound. It’s not consistent so I assume not all of their space is listed. > On Feb 14, 2018, at 4:00 AM, Stefan Haunß wrote: > > > >> On 02/14/2018 10:51 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: >> His users mi

Re: [mailop] Yahoo Support Page

As much as I like to complain, I am not sure I would come to the same conclusion. It seems like a simple bug. Yours, David On 13 February 2018 at 19:49, Philip Paeps wrote: > On 2018-02-13 15:07:33 (+0100), David Hofstee wrote: > >> Ok... So this is the clue with the Yahoo form... There is a

mailop@mailop.org

On 02/14/2018 10:51 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > His users might want to receive mail from 1&1 users, and 1&1 outbounds being > on spamhaus stops this from happening? "might want"...I don't know him so I want more details... > > In cases like this, it is up to 1&1 to work out the block,

mailop@mailop.org

About which IPs are you talking about exactly? There are different outgoing relay- groups at 1and1. Especially the one which relays all forwarded (untrusted) emails of their customers is listed quite often as the forwarded emails are mostly spam. The general relay IPs routing all customer creat

mailop@mailop.org

Am 14.02.2018 um 06:13 schrieb - -: Y'all have your outbound listed on spamhaus and I'm taking a lot of heat for deliverability issues from your space. Please contact me or request spamhaus removal for your outbounds. Your courteous support staff hung up on me when I tried to explain that the

mailop@mailop.org

His users might want to receive mail from 1&1 users, and 1&1 outbounds being on spamhaus stops this from happening? In cases like this, it is up to 1&1 to work out the block, rather than expecting operators to put in place a whitelist. --srs On 14/02/18, 3:17 PM, "mailop on behalf of Stefan H

mailop@mailop.org

Scott, if you could describe your problem a bit more detailed you might get helped. why do you care of outbound IPs listed on spamhaus? are you a 1and1 customer? Cheers, Stefan On 02/14/2018 06:13 AM, - - wrote: > Y'all have your outbound listed on spamhaus and I'm taking a lot of heat > for de