[mailop] Microsoft PCL Clarification

2017-12-11 Thread Alex Price
Attention: Mike Wise and Terry Zink On a recent email, we noticed an email of our client had a pink banner stating "This might be a phishing message and is potentially unsafe". When researching what might be causing this, what we found strange is that the the Microsoft Anti-Spam header stated the

Re: [mailop] KPN - Contact

2017-12-11 Thread Dale Langley via mailop
Thanks all, I suspect that the problem in this instance is with Cloudmark filtering but it would be good to confirm either way. @Geoff, I'll drop you an email shortly. @Ewald, the abuse desk have indeed responded quickly but we've never got further than an initial response saying that they'd ad

Re: [mailop] 5.7.1 bounce codes

2017-12-11 Thread Al Iverson
If you use a counter-based bounce processing system that eventually invalidates repeatedly 5xx bouncing recipients, I wouldn't exclude 5.7.1 response codes from that process. If your sending client isn't actively addressing the issue and working with you to get the block removed, then continuing to

Re: [mailop] KPN - Contact

2017-12-11 Thread Geoff Mulligan
Dale,   I have some contacts in the IoT group at KPN.  I don't know if they can help but I can put you in touch...         Geoff On 12/11/2017 07:02 AM, Dale Langley via mailop wrote: Hi all, We're struggling to get a response from KPN on some issues delivering email to their network (doma

Re: [mailop] 5.7.1 bounce codes

2017-12-11 Thread Maarten Oelering
I would not say exclusively. Code 5.7.1 is also used for “Relay access denied” for example. This bounce is often caused by typo domains that end up at a default MX. From my experience, it is better to match a bounce category first on the text, and then on the status code. For the actions, I agr

[mailop] 5.7.1 bounce codes

2017-12-11 Thread Alexander Burch
5.7.1 codes are used exclusively for policy blocks (IP blacklisted, content deemed spammy etc). Gmail uses it for DMARC rejections. Hotmail also uses 5.7.1 when an IP is outright blocked. This type of bounce confuses me a little. It certainly shouldn't be used to mark the recipient as invalid, a

Re: [mailop] KPN - Contact

2017-12-11 Thread ewald kessler | webpower
People at KPN Abuse Team (ab...@kpn.com) respond rather quickly to inquiries. But, as they rely on third party spam filtering, actual solutions might take some time. Regards, Ewald -- Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com ewald.kess...@webpower.nl t: +31 342 423 262 On 11 De

[mailop] KPN - Contact

2017-12-11 Thread Dale Langley via mailop
Hi all, We're struggling to get a response from KPN on some issues delivering email to their network (domains: planet.nl, kpnmail.nl, telfort.nl, hetnet.nl, kpnplanet.nl, wxs.nl, tiscali.nl). Does anyone have any contact info (or tips) they'd be willing to share? Thanks, Dale Head of De