On Fri, 27 Oct 2017, at 20:10, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> Is there someone from Yahoo! who can provide some insight into why
> there is always 1 SPF lookup failure in your DMARC reports.
I am pretty sure I have observed the very same issue. However, my
volume is lower than yours, and all reports th
On 28 October 2017 at 18:47, Benjamin BILLON via mailop
wrote:
> We couldn't retrieve SNDS data for the past few days (the data feed
> replies 204 No content), and when trying to log in the web-UI it says
> "There's a temporary problem with the service. Please try again. If you
> continue to get
Hello,
We couldn't retrieve SNDS data for the past few days (the data feed replies
204 No content), and when trying to log in the web-UI it says "There's a
temporary problem with the service. Please try again. If you continue to
get this message, try again later."
Does the same problem occur for
Mhh I'm not sure to follow how it's related. Your freemail accounts are
then absolutely not reactive, ok. So if the sender was doing things good
enough, he shouldn't be sending to those at the first place (I guess you
don't subscribe your spamtraps to newsletters just for fun or watching the
world
On 28 Oct 2017, at 4:12 (-0400), Benjamin BILLON via mailop wrote:
This basically makes JMRP irrelevant for ESPs: we don't
have reliable metrics,
You must know already that ESP "metrics" are laughable to begin with,
right?
For example, I have multiple freemail accounts, some of which exist
Hi all,
Anyone from google mail on list?
Have one of our /24's that are having issues when sending and receiving to any
domain that is hosted with google.
Only started happening about 2 weeks ago. Have checked all the obvious or
blacklisting, RDNS and our clients SPF records.
Cheers,
Ross
<>___
Hi Michael,
> Also, the JMRP doesn't generate 1:1 reports for each piece of traffic
reported as spam.
> The ratio is much smaller than that, otherwise senders would use it for
List Washing, and that's frowned upon.
Wow, wow wow wow.
This is absolutely new to me.
That would explain why we receive o