Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

ab...@constantcontact.com, with a complete copy of the message, would be the right place to report this. This mailing list isn't, really. Cheers, Steve > On Aug 9, 2017, at 8:36 AM, Bryan Bradsby > wrote: > > Constant Contact > > Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell yo

Re: [mailop] Gmail labeled as Spam based on content

To add to what Laura said, when we first started getting lots of questions about why specific campaigns got bulked at Gmail, we found lots of the campaigns having blacklisted links in them. We could never tell if it was because Gmail actually used those blacklists, or just independently arrived at

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

On Wed, 09 Aug 2017 10:36:37 -0500, Bryan Bradsby wrote: >postmas...@texas.gov, >Bryan Bradsby I'm assuming you are not associated with the regular spam from "Office of the Governor" ? mdr -- "There are no laws here, only agreements." -- Masahiko __

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

> Bryan, > > I work for Constant Contact and can look into this. Can you send a sample to > me offlist please? > > Tara Natanson Aah...nevermind my offer, I see that she is here. :-) Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

Bryan, I work for Constant Contact and can look into this. Can you send a sample to me offlist please? Tara Natanson On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Bryan Bradsby < bryan.brad...@capnet.state.tx.us> wrote: > Constant Contact > > Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell your se

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

hehe.. and it is always funny when marketers send to our spam auditing team, or the abuse addresses.. You 'think' that they would have a mechanism to strip abuse@ before sending to a culled list.. On 17-08-09 08:36 AM, Bryan Bradsby wrote: Constant Contact Why did you send spam to our DNS t

Re: [mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

> Constant Contact > > Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell your services? > > "Save 50% for 2 months" > > postmas...@texas.gov, > Bryan Bradsby Bryan - may I share this with the person at Constant Contact who is in charge of abuse issues? Anne Anne P. Mitchell, Attorn

Re: [mailop] emails offering email l;ists for sale

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 2017-08-04 at 01:08 +, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: > If the sender is Hotmail, Outlook, et al ... or if it's an Office365 > customer, we always like to know about it. I am seeing a fair number of those also, dkim signed by: aimdigita

[mailop] spam report: ccm167.constantcontact.com [208.75.123.167]

Constant Contact Why did you send spam to our DNS team attempting to sell your services? "Save 50% for 2 months"  postmas...@texas.gov, Bryan Bradsby 512.936.2248 DIR/CTS/NOC-IT ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/c

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools

Seems the IP reputation is back, also for the previous days. 2017-08-08 19:09 GMT+02:00 Mohammed Ahmed : > I got an update that Gmail is looking into this issue and will get an > update once it will get resolved. > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Michael Rathbun wrote: > >> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017

Re: [mailop] Gmail Postmaster Tools

We do have data for all, excepted from Aug. 3rd to 6th, no data for Feedback Loop only (there's data for other metrics), on all domains I had a look at. -- Benjamin 2017-08-08 17:51 GMT+02:00 Ken O'Driscoll : > Same here on client domains. > > -- > Ken O'Driscoll / We Mon