On May 21, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> Some explanation for my deep curiosity Mailman (which I hack on
>> here and there) and other MLMs had problems in the past because
>> Mailman modifies the body and append
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:39 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> Some explanation for my deep curiosity Mailman (which I hack on
> here and there) and other MLMs had problems in the past because
> Mailman modifies the body and appends a footer (as seen on this list).
> So the advice, years ago, wa
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
>> On May 21, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>>
On May 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>
> On May 21, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>>
>>> On May 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2016 17:00:37 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrot
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
>> On May 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 17:00:37 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>>
Give me a (real world) example of how 2 DKIM sigs will
> On May 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 May 2016 17:00:37 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>>> Give me a (real world) example of how 2 DKIM sigs will be in the same
>>> email msg and both sigs will verify.
>>
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Michael Rathbun wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016 17:00:37 -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
>>Give me a (real world) example of how 2 DKIM sigs will be in the same
>>email msg and both sigs will verify.
>
> Here are two:
>
>>Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
>>
