Re: [mailop] "Spammer TLDs" and IP addresses without a reverse?

2016-04-20 Thread David Conrad
> While true, how can I pragmatically determine the registrar during the SMTP > session in a way that scales? Well, in theory and at least for the new gTLDs: % whois -h whois.nic. | grep -i "registrar:" although % whois -h whois.nic. | grep -i "registrar iana id:" is probably a bit better a

Re: [mailop] "Spammer TLDs" and IP addresses without a reverse?

2016-04-20 Thread Dave Warren
On 2016-04-19 11:11, Luis E. Muñoz wrote: This is really an over-simplification. New TLDs have a lower ham:spam ratio, which comes as a consequence of the length of time they’ve been available. Older TLDs have been around for years, and therefore have a substantially higher amount of ham (do