Re: [mailop] TLS/SSL DROWN attack with respect to email servers

2016-03-03 Thread Petar Bogdanovic
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:45:50PM +, Matthew Huff wrote: > If your mail server still is advertising SSLv2, you SSL private key may be > vulnerable. Does DROWN allow an attacker to steal the server’s private key? No. DROWN allows an attacker to decrypt one connection at a time. The attacker

Re: [mailop] TLS/SSL DROWN attack with respect to email servers

2016-03-03 Thread Doug McIntyre
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Johann Klasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:01:33PM -0800, Franck Martin via mailop wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Brandon Long wrote: > > > > > I thought that POODLE required a specific type of fallback that tended to > > > be browser s

Re: [mailop] TLS/SSL DROWN attack with respect to email servers

2016-03-03 Thread Johann Klasek
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:01:33PM -0800, Franck Martin via mailop wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Brandon Long wrote: > > > I thought that POODLE required a specific type of fallback that tended to > > be browser specific (ie, prevent a tls connection, forcing the browser to > > fall ba