Re: [mailop] Migration of mail client profiles from one system to another

2016-02-23 Thread Rolf E. Sonneveld
Hi, Graeme, > On 23 Feb 2016, at 13:52, Rolf E. Sonneveld > wrote: > > In the past something like ACAP was developed to aid in these types > > of situations, but AFAIK Outlook does not support ACAP and ACAP > > itself is more or less dead? Has anyone a suggestion to: > > > > a) use multiple test

Re: [mailop] Migration of mail client profiles from one system to another

2016-02-23 Thread Graeme Fowler
On 23 Feb 2016, at 16:08, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: > thanks a lot for this pointer! Is it (in principle) possible to use these PRF > files without having Admin rights? If I read the docs correctly Admin is only > required to use the Office Customization Tool and it is possible to use the > PRF

Re: [mailop] Migration of mail client profiles from one system to another

2016-02-23 Thread Graeme Fowler
On 23 Feb 2016, at 13:52, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote: > In the past something like ACAP was developed to aid in these types of > situations, but AFAIK Outlook does not support ACAP and ACAP itself is more > or less dead? Has anyone a suggestion to: > > a) use multiple test accounts (a few dozens)

[mailop] Migration of mail client profiles from one system to another

2016-02-23 Thread Rolf E. Sonneveld
Hi, this may be slightly off-topic, but I wonder whether there's anyone on this list who has some suggestion re. the following 'problem'. One of my customers is using a mail client (Outlook) with a number of profiles to access a number of IMAP (test) accounts. He has to 'clone' these profiles

Re: [mailop] mailop + DMARC + mailman = mung_from

2016-02-23 Thread Renaud Allard via mailop
On 02/23/2016 11:46 AM, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: (Assuming the operators/rule-setters care about DKIM) I'd expect spamassassin to score a broken DKIM signature, but ignore (or treat separately) an X-Header. spamassassin default score for a broken DKIM is: 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKI

Re: [mailop] mailop + DMARC + mailman = mung_from

2016-02-23 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, John Levine wrote: > I turn the old signature into an X-header, which strips it of its > power as far as machine validation goes, but leaves it available for > human debugging if desired. An X-Header and a broken DKIM signature have exactly the same validation power: none.