On 2/2/16, 7:59 PM, "mailop on behalf of John Levine"
wrote:
>>return-path address
>>rejected by mail1.example.com:25:
>
>> after reading RFC5322
>
>Um, that's the wrong spec. RFC 5321 describes the rules for SMTP.
Yeah, and RFC 5321 says to use header formats as defined in RFC 822. Which
was
>return-path address
>rejected by mail1.example.com:25:
> after reading RFC5322
Um, that's the wrong spec. RFC 5321 describes the rules for SMTP.
>1) Am I correct in believing that two dots with no intervening atext
>characters are illegal in a return-path?
Yes. The argument of a MAIL FROM
A contractor just started getting bounce messages when he tries to email
$DAYJOB -- the message is accepted by our Exim frontend but then rejected
by our Exchange 2013 server with the error message below (example.com and
example.net are placeholders for two different .com domains; outside
sender is
