On 05/05/15 12:14, Dave Pooser wrote:
> From Todd Lyons' .sig:
>
> The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' problems is $0.
> If you want them to accept your mail and manage it the way you want,
> send it the way the spec says to. --John Levine
That is the one, thank you! I knew I'd
On 5/4/15, 8:40 PM, "Ted Cooper" wrote:
> What I can remember went something
>like this:
>
>>Recipient's budget to deal with your delivery problems: zero.
>
>Does that ring any bells for anyone? Link to the source?
>From Todd Lyons' .sig:
The total budget at all receivers for solving senders' p
This is probably a quote from the old spam-l mailing list or nanae, if you were
around then - I haven’t been on those for over a decade.
> On 05-May-2015, at 7:10 am, Ted Cooper wrote:
>
>>
>> Recipient's budget to deal with your delivery problems: zero.
>
> Does that ring any bells for anyon
Hi all,
Many moons ago, someone related to email said something which stuck in
my head and gave me a giggle. I know kinda how it went, but now that
I've tried to search for it and quot the person who said, I'm having no
luck at all.
The quote was related to delivery problems and how it is the sen
