>Obviously this doesn't speak to how temporary it was, but to hear the
>Yahoo/AOL folks tell it, there was an immediate drop-off in very visible
>effects (ie, they were having a large support volume issue due to people
>actually calling them about this) and it hasn't come back.
AOL and Yahoo had a
In article <888f200b-0e5e-42d9-99a0-5a7c33420...@linkedin.com> you write:
>>> I run a small listserv supporting the Presidential Innovation Fellows
>at the White House and a few alumni classes at the Air Force Academy,
>plus a couple of small other lists. These are not huge lists, perhaps
>100 on
> On Feb 14, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> Be prepared for a reality where nearly all of the SCOMP reports you
> will ever get are false positives generated by careless, ignorant,
> clueless AOL users.
We have customers who have end users who *pay* to receive their mailings, and
s
> From: Eric Tykwinski
> This is were I wish there was some standardization of bounce messages.
> If email server operators could receive reports of X number of bounces
> reliably it may cut down on the number of compromised accounts considerably,
> by scripting some sort of shutdown of the accou
> On Feb 13, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Michael Wise wrote:
>
> Two things I would recommend most highly, not just for AOL recipients but
> others as well.
>
> 1) emphasize the desirability of adding the mailing list address to Safe
> Senders, preferably at the top of the email.
> 2) emphasize how eas
Be prepared for a reality where nearly all of the SCOMP reports you
will ever get are false positives generated by careless, ignorant,
clueless AOL users.
I've had a feedback loop there since March 2004, and easily, *easily*,
well over 99% of the reports I've ever gotten were from people on
maili
> From: Eric Tykwinski
> This is were I wish there was some standardization of bounce messages.
> If email server operators could receive reports of X number of bounces
> reliably it may cut down on the number of compromised accounts considerably,
> by scripting some sort of shutdown of the accoun
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:53:15AM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> Probably because fewer people by several orders of magnitude use discussion
> lists than are affected by the phishing problems that DMARC and the
> AOL/Yahoo MSPs are trying to solve.
1. The phishing problems that they're allegedly tr
