One of the options for columns in the viewer window is Tags( ), with a
mysterious symbol in the bracket. What is this?
Martin
___
mailmate mailing list
mailmate@lists.freron.com
https://lists.freron.com/listinfo/mailmate
On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:43, Martin S Taylor wrote:
One of the options for columns in the viewer window is Tags( ), with a
mysterious symbol in the bracket. What is this?
Tags will be an array as multiple are possible. According to the Emoji
overview 🔣 is
Input symbol for Symbol, Unicode: U+1F5
On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:15, Charlie Clark wrote:
One of the options for columns in the viewer window is Tags( ), with
a mysterious symbol in the bracket. What is this?
Tags will be an array as multiple are possible.
Sorry, I don't understand this.
When I look at the column headed Tags(🔣) it
On 10 Nov 2020, at 11:22, Martin S Taylor wrote:
On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:15, Charlie Clark wrote:
One of the options for columns in the viewer window is Tags( ), with
a mysterious symbol in the bracket. What is this?
Tags will be an array as multiple are possible.
Sorry, I don't understand t
On 10 Nov 2020, at 16:26, Eric Sharakan wrote:
When I look at the column headed Tags(🔣) it's always empty.
Hi, you add your own emojis via the Tags preferences pane of MailMate.
Thanks, but when I look at the column headed Tags(🔣) it's still
always empty, even when I attach a tag (either
Is it possible to set up a condition for smart mailbox A that will catch
all messages that are in smart mailbox B, without just copying all the
conditions for B over to A? Copying them over requires manually keeping
the two sets of conditions identical; if I make a change to B I have to
remembe
What stops you from setting mailbox B as the source for mailbox A?
If you do that, then the conditions you set for A apply only to mails
that are shown in B.
You can have multiple source mailboxes for smart mailboxes, those being
either true mailboxes, combo mailboxes or smart mailboxes.
On 10
Setting B as a source mailbox for A would mean that A's conditions would
be applied to messages in B and the messages that meet them would be
included in A, but messages in B that do not meet them wouldn't be. What
I want is to define A with a nonexclusive OR: A's conditions need to be
along th
Shoshanna:
On 10 Nov 2020, at 20:43, Shoshanna Green wrote:
What I want is to define A with a nonexclusive OR: A's conditions need
to be along the lines of
ANY OF:
- is contained in B
- [set of other conditions]
I've had this problem, too, and it is awkward, isn't it? You'd think you
cou
