On 2 Sep 2024, at 17:28, Verdon Vaillancourt wrote:
> My response would be to tell the sender that their email is non-conforming to
> email standards, that you are unable to read it, and that they will have to
> resend it through another provider. Don’t fall to this kind of pressure. Put
> the
On 2 Sep 2024, at 17:28, Verdon Vaillancourt wrote:
> My response would be to tell the sender that their email is non-conforming to
> email standards, that you are unable to read it, and that they will have to
> resend it through another provider. Don’t fall to this kind of pressure. Put
> the
On 2024-09-02 at 11:28:54 UTC-0400 (Mon, 2 Sep 2024 11:28:54 -0400)
Verdon Vaillancourt
is rumored to have said:
My response would be to tell the sender that their email is
non-conforming to email standards, that you are unable to read it, and
that they will have to resend it through another p
My response would be to tell the sender that their email is non-conforming to
email standards, that you are unable to read it, and that they will have to
resend it through another provider. Don’t fall to this kind of pressure. Put
the onus where it belongs.
> On Sep 2, 2024, at 5:22 AM, Robert
Hi,
I just received an RPMSG message, and it looks like Microsoft uses the next
*non-industry standard* to force people to use their technology.
For background information, see: https://openrpmsgfile.com/
I'm wondering how to deal with this. I don't want to use a crappy viewer
application or f
