Ooh, I hadn't thought of that.
So I could move extremely old emails to their own imap folder, then
unsubscribe from that folder,
and the emails won't be counted in mailmate's database. That could work.
Thanks a bunch
Cheers,
V.
On 14 Mar 2013, at 17:10, Benny Kj?r Nielsen wrote:
> On 14 Mar 20
On 14 Mar 2013, at 16:42, Vincent Noel wrote:
> Am I right then in thinking that moving messages out of the inbox into
> an
> Archive folder does not help mailmate ? Any message has the same load
> on
> mailmate, whatever its location on the imap server?
Yes, at least for some aspects of MailMa
Hello benny,
Am I right then in thinking that moving messages out of the inbox into an
Archive folder does not help mailmate ? Any message has the same load on
mailmate, whatever its location on the imap server?
Is there any way to help mailmate then, apart from deleting the messages
altogether?
On 13 Mar 2013, at 19:23, Gustavo Daniel Villarreal wrote:
> I am on my final days of evaluation of MailMate and I really like a
> lot of things and I have decided to buy it,
Thanks for trying out MailMate. I hope you'll still consider using
MailMate even though the answers below are probably n
At 20:34 +0100 3/13/13, Benny Kj?r Nielsen wrote:
>On 13 Mar 2013, at 19:23, Gustavo Daniel Villarreal wrote:
>
>but I don't see an option to store offline mail, eg., local folders.
>
>Correct, there is no such option.
>
>Since Mountain Lion, Mail.app has been constantly using 30-40% CPU,
>I've se
I understand. Yes I am convinced in buying MailMate; there are still a
few features I will be missing from Mail, such as data detectors, and
I'm also not sure how incoming filters work yet, or if they are
available at all, but MailMate has other features that now I realise I
need, such as Markd
Hello,
I am on my final days of evaluation of MailMate and I really like a lot
of things and I have decided to buy it, but I don't see an option to
store offline mail, eg., local folders. Since Mountain Lion, Mail.app
has been constantly using 30-40% CPU, I've seen this issue on more
machines